“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(Many sessions ago, Seth told us he had a dog fragment personality still here on Earth. [...] “Number twenty-five: Do you have any physical fragments of any kind still here on earth?”)

Now, using an analogy only, let me explain that your thoughts and feelings also give off shadows (intently) that we will here call hallucinations.² They are quite valid. [...]

2. Seth’s creative use of “hallucinations” here is certainly at variance with the concepts ordinarily associated with the word. [...]

[...] In fact, material on Three Mile Island developed in the session held this afternoon, which is the main reason we decided to give these excerpts here.

[...] Here are quotations from the answers Jane gave while in trance today:

What Seth is saying here is that the inner self uses this sense to initiate the birth of one of its personalities in physical life. [...]

(“I had something from him [Seth] earlier,” she said, “but you weren’t here....” [...]

Give me a moment here. [...]

I would like here to discuss a fact about which we have spoken briefly in the past; that is, that the inner world cannot be examined with the outer senses, that indeed the main purpose of the outer senses is the interpretation of the outer or camouflage existence.

(I would like to remind the reader here that when Seth uses the term “area,” he means what up until recently he has called a “level” of the subconscious. [...]

[...] I did not want to break the context or the continuity here, and it was much better that Ruburt remain in a constant state of deep dissociation for the most faithful interpretation of the dreams.

[...] There is quite a bit involved here.

[...] It has resulted in a greater freedom in our sessions because the two of you together discussed your conscious beliefs about sessions, and Ruburt learned that many of his previous beliefs here were limited.

[...] Our bill has run up again to around $55,000 — and here insurance hasn’t been sending me any checks. [...]

I have dealt with this extensively here because creative, unconscious energy is so often a part of the dream state. [...]

[...] Those of you who want a more general idea of Seth’s views can refer to The Seth Material. Here, I’ll give the material on dreams as it was given to us in succeeding sessions — particularly in the early part of the book. [...]

[...] There is a psychic give-and-take here that will partly compensate for the present lack of congenial friends.

(Here Jane smiled.)

(“Why does my brother Dick want to stop here in Elmira to see us before he goes on down to Sayre to see our mother on Saturday?”)

[...] Give us time here. [...]

[...] It doesn’t seem tonight’s material would fit in here either

[...] As I told you once before, his “main life” was not here, in your terms. [...]

Here I want to continue with our earlier discussion—(humorously:) or monologue. [...]

[...] (Forcefully in here.) You may complain, to save face, both of you, and only a strong relationship like yours would survive under those conditions.

(Here Seth refers to Jane discussing Sumari in writing class this afternoon.)

[...] (Long pause.) Give us a moment here.

[...] This implies a dual consciousness here, since I was aware of both bodies.

It is therefore theoretically possible for you to see the world through a frog’s eye, or a bird’s or an ant’s. We are speaking here of physical senses. [...]

[...] “Oh, he’s got them stacked up to here,” and Jane patted the top of her head.

Before you embark upon other journeys of consciousness, understand that your beliefs will follow you and form your experience there as they do here. [...]

[...] It might be easier here, perhaps, if you compare a scene from a dream with a scene in a photograph. [...]

(9:50.) For many reasons, some mentioned here and some not as yet discussed, you have closed your dreams out of your lives to a large extent. [...]

[...] What I have called the predream state here is actually one in which you are always immersed whether you are waking or sleeping, or whether in your terms you are alive or dead. [...]

Please understand: I am not saying here that you have no conscious control over events, for they are formed by you in accordance with your feelings, beliefs, purposes, and intents.