“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] It is not harmful but may surprise you. [...]

[...] It will do neither good nor harm.

[...] The dream body cannot be harmed while the physical one can—as man quickly found out as he transformed his experience largely from one to the other. [...]

(9:29.) A man believing he has heart trouble will finally, through his own anxiety, affect the functioning of his “involuntary” system until his heart is definitely harmed if the belief goes unchecked. [...]

[...] Now you have other sets of quite positive beliefs also working for you, and luckily these will often help shake a harmful belief off balance. [...]

[...] No one can deny that a war fought by dreaming men, at specified times, would be less harmful than a physical war, to return to my flight of fancy.

[...] I see no harm in sleeping until 8:00 the morning after a session, but a balance of schedule is important, and you can see that I wish to relate you to yourself and your work, and not to turn all your energies toward myself.

[...] And remember, no harm can come to either of you through training your inner senses. [...]

[...] The chapter deals with the negative effects and aspects of inoculations, and certainly reinforces Seth’s own material in Mass Events on the harmful effects of many inoculations. [...]

[...] You are learning how to use the creative energy of which you are a part, and you are indeed quite isolated, so you cannot do much harm, in your terms. [...]

[...] Ruburt’s mind, believe it or not, is much like my own; though, if you’ll forgive me, in a very limited fashion, therefore the distortions are much less distortive, much less harmful, and more easily discovered and cleared.

[...] It is basically inadequate and harmful to them, and when you judge yourself not against your own healthier ideas, but against their unhealthy attitudes, you are inadvertently judging yourself harshly.

At times he can show malice, but in small ways, not harmful ones. [...]

Some harm was done, of course. [...]

Maltz is quite correct, in that an overly conscious (underlined) attempt is harmful. [...]

[...] It will do neither of you harm, and might do you both good, to discuss our sessions personally with some other persons whom you have mentioned.

(Long pause.) Now: the substance (DMSO), used as you are using it, will not do Ruburt any harm, and can be of great value, as it introduces more equitable bodily motions and sensations that now, with Ruburt’s greater understanding, he can accept, appreciate, and put to fullest benefit. [...]

The books will not harm you unless you take them as literal unbiased basic truth. [...]

[...] It does him no good to let him avoid them, and it may do him severe harm.

[...] Evidently the psychological factors associated with the venting idea will be ignored as long as there’s no foreseeable chance that physical harm will be done to the population surrounding TMI. [...]

[...] The chemicals used to protect agriculture had harmful effects upon people. [...]

[...] I still wanted to know why that portion of the personality was so blind to the harm it was wreaking—why it didn’t understand even in its own terms that its devastation was threatening greatly the very security and protection it has said it wanted. [...]