“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(For the following, 73rd session, we had as guests Dr. and Mrs. Piper, with whom we have become acquainted in the past year or so. [...]

[...] If you are going to have a guest, you may as well have a ghost that they do not eat food. [...]

[...] And as I always do to show not only guests and seeming strangers the nature of vitality but always to impress it as deeply as possible into your knowledge, then let me again remind you that this vitality is your own; that life, physical or nonphysical, is a full vitality that it is not necessarily quiet, that it is not necessarily sedate, and though my voice does not ring with the innocent chatter of children, that that same vitality that fills them fills me and fills each of you. [...]

[...] But we don’t really feel like confronting guests. [...]

[...] I explained that by the question I didn’t mean I wanted a host of predictions or gaudy claims; I was merely curious to see what Seth might say concerning the two guests we expected. [...]

[...] Consciously I had not wanted to have the session, since I thought our guests hadn’t had enough time to study related material.

[...] We had guests the following Friday evening, and as Jane described the multiple-channel effects to them, she realized that she was tuning into some of Seth’s backlog of data about peer groups and the need to conform. [...]

[...] The dark-haired young man was trying to talk me into displaying some of my smaller paintings in the room in his funeral home where guests were seated for viewings, etc. [...]

His new room gave him the view that he wanted, but no protection—and not only that, but then he was the one who met guests head-on.

[...] The body itself may be viewed, for example, and many funerals have a guest of honor amidst the company — and no one gazes into the face of the corpse with as much curiosity and wonder.

[...] Perhaps an unbidden guest dropped by, or holidays intruded. [...]

The guests of the other evening were most advantageous, their attitudes objective; not gullible people, nor on the other hand were they the type who will not admit the results of their own experience. [...]

[...] A group of four guests in particular, men I believe, to his apartment. [...]

[...] In your enthusiasm you send out messages to all kinds of guests ...but you should be selective, and be careful of the company you keep.

[...] I had the uneasy feeling that it might signify my worries that yesterday’s “guest,” a Mr. Fred Conyers, might return. [...]

(Richard Bach, the author of Jonathan Livingston Seagull, left this morning after having been our guest since Monday, the 28th. [...]

(Although they were surprised at first our guests did not stay surprised long, and began to bombard Seth with questions. [...]

[...] This is why I worked so well with Philip, to make the most of the opportunity while we did have a guest.

[...] Your guests today were hardly uninvited—at least subconsciously.

[...] (To me:) You were speaking to your guest John with some evidence of dissatisfaction in your voice, some self-accusation, some irritation, wondering why as a young man you did not make greater breakthroughs in your art. [...]