“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] The info above covers Dr. Gene Bernard’s recent letter on our behalf to Prentice-Hall, and Raymond Van Over’s telepathic understanding of same.)

[...] Your individuality was always latent within your soul, and the “history” that is a part of you is written within unconscious memory that resides not only within your psyche, but is faithfully decoded in your genes and chromosomes,¹ and fulfilled in the blood that rushes through your veins.

You both chafed against the belief of your times, that man was a natural aggressor, tainted from birth, that he was damned by his very nature, condemned by his early childhood background, by original sin, or by his genes. [...]

(Jane said she would like some data on the personality Ignaptha, mentioned by Seth during the session held for Gene Bernard a couple of years ago.

(This is a word used by Seth in the session held for Gene Bernard a couple of years ago.)

[...] And the selfish gene has nothing to do with any of it (emphatically).

In the public mind, it made little difference whether the devil or tainted genes condemned the individual to a life in which it seemed he could have little control. [...]

[...] The meaning of life was reduced to the accidental nature of genes. [...]

[...] Such biological precognition is firmly based in the chromosomes and genes, and reflected in the cells. [...]

[...] And what guided those creatures, I wondered — magnetic lines of force, genes, innate knowledge — or what? [...]

[...] As certain physical data are carried along in the gene structure, so this inner information is codified within whatever psychological structures the Speakers may inhabit; but far more readily available than it is to other personalities. [...]

[...] The genes do not simply hold information without any reference to the body’s living system. [...]

[...] You could be betrayed by your genes. [...]

(“How about Gene Bernard’s letter? [...]

[...] Some moral philosophers, medical geneticists, physicians, lawyers, and religious leaders believe that those who carry genes for serious genetic diseases do not have the right to reproduce. [...]

[...] Nevertheless, the condensed code-like comprehension of what I prefer to call the mental genes is at all times available, though not necessarily to the egotistic “I am.”

[...] Voices speak through the genes and chromosomes that connect the future and the past in a balance that you call the present form. [...]

[...] They carry the genes, the “blueprints” that determine hereditary characteristics. [...]

[...] They carry the genes, the factors or units — “blueprints” — that determine hereditary characteristics.

[...] You are quite free for example in your relationship with our friend Aerofranz (Tam Mossman), and you were with (Gene) Bernard, and more than fair with Instream. [...]