“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] You have been doing very well, for you, in allowing yourself psychic freedom. [...]

[...] Perhaps if she attains a sense of inner peace and protection she will come to naturally make such choices; doing which will encourage her feeling of personal freedom and safety instead of threatening it.

[...] Every session is obviously personal, since Jane delivered them all, but now I’m encouraging the overall intimacy of these personal sessions to seek their own intimate freedom—and of course I know that doing this will not only help others, but me too.

[...] That, I’m sure, is a privilege I’ll have full freedom to carry out, if I choose to. [...]

[...] Routines, yes, but also ever-changing ones that still revolved around the simple elements of the work we loved and carried out amid the unexpected freedoms of living so much closer to the environment we had always taken for granted: the writing and painting, the sessions and mail, the publishing of books, the visits of friends and fans, some even from Europe. [...]

[...] You are learning how to form reality from your own beliefs, while having at the same time the freedom to choose those beliefs—to chose your mental state in a way that the animals, for example, do not. [...]

[...] The physical symptoms⁸ served quite literally as a framework in which spontaneity was to some extent at least allowed a mental and psychic freedom, until he felt secure.

[...] They demand a certain amount of freedom for their children, however, and while they are not political activists, like the Sumari their ideas often spring to prominence before large social changes, and help initiate them. [...]

[...] They begin to look at the structure of their lives in a different fashion that attempts to evoke from nature, and from their own natures, some graceful effortlessness, some freedom nearly forgotten. [...]

[...] Yet I also wanted a personality which would allow itself the spontaneity necessary, and the inner freedom, so that such communications could take place. [...]

[...] Her art contains a charming, innocent, mystical freedom that I envy. [...]

[...] She asked if I’d mind work on Dreams this evening, and I said of course not—that she and Seth have the absolute freedom to talk about anything at all. [...]

[...] I found her visions particularly poignant, because in them she had seen herself as having the full and unconscious freedom of physical motion that the very young so take for granted. [...]

[...] He said that usually he has complete freedom from pain on such junkets.)

[...] My dogma is the freedom of the individual (my emphasis). My dogma is the sacrilegious one — that each of you is a good individual. [...]