“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(“What about those fragments you said Jane and I created at York Beach, Maine, last August? [...]

I have told you they were fragments, and if you will reread the material in the light of the newer material on matter, then the whole incident will become more plain to you. [...]

[...] What if Jane and I go to York Beach in Maine again, and meet those fragments we created; what will happen, if anything?”)

(“If by any chance Jane and I meet those fragments at York Beach again, will we be able to speak to them?”)

[...] In Asia Minor, and fragments of a past civilization were then there. [...]

[...] He was not one personality, as I have told you, but a highly developed entity, sometimes appearing as a fragment of himself.

JANE’S SILVER DREAM FRAGMENT

[...] You must recall our discussions concerning fragments. Fragments of this type have all the potentialities of the parent, inner energy. [...]

[...] For the material on fragments see the very early sessions; it is scattered throughout them.)

[...] I wanted to see if the questions would help Jane establish contact with another entity or a fragment. [...]

[...] Frank Watts was a fathead,” he said with obvious satisfaction, even though Frank Watts was a personality fragment of Seth’s own entity.

[...] The apparition you saw beside your bed last summer was a personality fragment out of your past, warning you that you have an imbalance as far as height is concerned. [...]

[...] They are themselves fragments, struggling small fragments, without intention of harm. [...]

The midplane contains a conglomeration of fragments … who have not attained sufficient knowledge or manipulability to progress further at this point. [...]

[...] All of these fragments have consciousness to a rather high degree, considering that man holds them in such low repute.

[...] A fragment may project, you see, but one atom could not contain the full projecting consciousness of an adult human mind.

[...] But the projecting fragments themselves, you see, do not come and leave unaffected, but grow and mature and develop, really, other portions of the self in continuing extensions. [...]

[...] Needless to say there is great fluidity and variety and challenge on the part of personalities and fragments and personality fragments.

[...] There is much involved here in the matter of personality fragments and of particular personalities, and it is too late for me to begin a discussion in depth.

Upon this depends, to a large extent, the strength of any sort of a fragment, and this ability as much as any other is a limiting factor also. [...]

[...] I have promised to give you more material dealing with the psychic construction of the entity, and its relationship to its fragments. [...]

As the physical atoms and molecules combine to form cells, and the cells to form physical organs, and as they do not lose their individuality in so doing, and as the atoms and molecules themselves actually gain and share in higher perceptions because of this gestalt, so do the basic components or fragments of an entity constantly form new and varied personalities; and these in turn form entities of their own.

There is indeed no contradiction, though it may appear so, in the fact that all entities existed before your planet was formed, and the fact that fragments form new entities. [...]

[...] That is, many fragment personalities do become entities. [...]

(“An initiation, and a bringing together of fragments.” [...] The use of the word fragments here, by Seth, led us to think that reincarnational motives might be involved in the marriage; but I did not think to quiz Seth about this when he resumed. In the very early sessions Seth began to use fragment as a reference to each physical personality manifested by the entity.

[...] An initiation, and a bringing together of fragments. [...]

In fact, fragments of many episodes from many other lives may rush into their consciousness, and in most cases they are, of course, quite unprepared for the experience. [...]

[...] Visible or invisible to you, each fragment of the universe has a consciousness of its own. Pain and pleasure, the strongest aspects of all consciousness, are experienced strongly by every fragment, according to its degree. [...]

[...] All these fragments have consciousness to a rather high degree, considering that man holds them in such ill repute.

In some fragments such as much plant life and vegetative life there is strong use of certain inner senses. [...]

[...] At a later date I intend to go quite intensively into the means by which other fragments sense each other, and man. [...]

[...] They are themselves fragments, struggling small fragments without intention of harm. [...] It is only when you give tacit agreement that harm is inflicted upon you by these fragments. [...]

[...] The midplane or semiplane contains a conglomeration of fragments at all stages of development, except that they have not attained sufficient knowledge or manipulability to progress further at this point. [...]

[...] They are also in other terms entities, fragments of All That Is, if you prefer—divine fragments of power and majesty, containing (pause) all of the powers of consciousness as you think of it, concentrations without substance in your terms.

[...] Visible or invisible to you, each fragment of the universe has a consciousness of its own. Pain and pleasure, the strongest aspects of all consciousnesses, are experienced by every fragment, according to its degree. [...]

[...] It should be no surprise, then, that this same kind of “fitting together” includes subjective life also—or that, say, your private dreams are also fragments in a vaster dream reality. [...]

(Jane was left with a page or so of fragmented notes and a couple of possible chapter headings. [...]

(Portions of the article in yesterday’s newspaper, I should add, dealt with the recent discoveries of skeletal fragments in East Africa that indicate the coexistence of several varieties of ancient man and preman; the latter being creatures who looked rather human but whose brains, it is believed, remained apelike. [...]

Now I speak from several layers, though the word “speak" is a poor one, I turn myself, you see, into steps down which I walk and the steps represent what you would term personality fragments, though the term is distortive. [...] I am broken up into highly energized personality fragments of my own accord, you see. [...]

(“You once, a long time ago, said something about a dog fragment.” [...]

[...] The fragment is no longer concerned, however. [...]