“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

They are formed as I told you earlier. [...]

[...] And while these particles act as resistant boundary forces, they are also uniting forces, forming so to speak the connective tissue that both separates and unites.

A system may say that within its limitations there is room for still further transformation of energy into still more various camouflage forms. [...]

[...] There is great interplay, and as I mentioned in an earlier session, inward energy is itself transformed and affected and enriched by the camouflage forms or units that it produces.

[...] For there are infinite possibilities in the patterns which action can of itself form.

[...] The ego to a large degree, therefore, chooses during its development those characteristic actions which will form its nature. [...]

Inclinations with which the ego has very little liking, for example, are very seldom a problem for the ego, since they remain generally outside of the ego pattern, never having been chosen by it to form a characteristic part of the ego pattern. [...]

[...] All apparent units are merely formed by functions, the functions of action. [...]

[...] Therefore a rather large dose of vitamin D is recommended daily, in any acceptable form.

[...] (Long pause.) It must be formed slowly, as the child’s ego is. [...]

This new ego that he must form will come slowly. [...]

Now, it can form new ego elements to help it, and this is what is happening now.

[...] It often forms the content of each. [...] It is more knowledgeable than all other aspects of the personality, for it forms them together into a cohesive whole.

It is the director of all the subsidiary psychological subpersonalities that form the acting-present primary personality. [...]

There were languages then long before your earliest evidence of them, and in written form. [...]

[...] Sometimes in a developed manner, or simply in plan form, but never in the same organized domineering fashion.

[...] The earth has formed and reformed and reformed. [...]

[...] You form the reality that you know, not esoterically, not symbolically, not philosophically. Some great oversoul doesn’t form it for you — you cannot put the burden there, either. [...]

[...] To deny this is to try to force consciousness into some rigid form from which it cannot ever be freed, to apply rules to it that make a very neat psychological landscape.

[...] So even in forming sentences you deal with probabilities, and to some extent or another your body mimics, say, the various muscular responses that might be involved with each unspoken sentence.

[...] Events fit together, forming a cohesive whole that gives you a global scale of activities. [...]

[...] Your consciousness is cellularly-attuned in life, in that it perceives its own reality through cellular function that forms the bodily apparatus. [...]

[...] These often appear in the symbolic language of the arts instead, and many of your dreams are translations in which the events of Framework 2 appear in symbolic form.

To really understand your own connection with the events you encounter privately, and in relationship to others, you must first become acquainted with that medium in which events themselves are formed.

[...] What appears to you as chance or coincidence, however, is actually the result of the amazing organizations and communications active in the psychological reality of Framework 2. Again, you form your reality — but how? [...]

(9:50.) Give us a moment… You were born with the impetus toward growth built in — automatically provided with the inner blueprints that would lead to a developed adult form. [...]

[...] Your reasoning as you now use it, however, deals primarily with reality by dividing it into categories, forming distinctions, following the “laws” of cause and effect — and largely its realm is the examination of events already perceived. [...]

[...] In those terms, then, Framework 2 deals with associations, so that within it the recognizable events of the physical world can be put together in an infinite number of ways, after which they appear in your private experience according to directions you have given them through those associations that you form mentally.

[...] Then in Chapter 9 of Personal Reality, see the 637th session at 10:20: “A group of cells forms an organ. A group of selves forms a soul. [...]

[...] This does not mean that if you become consciously aware of such affiliations you must then feel it your responsibility to form a kind of culture of counterparts, or to try and affect other people’s lives by reminding them of your relationship. [...]

[...] Now the same can apply to counterparts, and those in your experience can show to you, in exaggerated form, comma, abilities of your own upon which you have not chosen to concentrate. [...]

These counterparts form psychic families. [...]

[...] The laws of nature that I am in the process of explaining underlie all realities, then, and form a firm basis for multitudinous kinds of “natures.” [...]

[...] While this is the case, however, these other forms of consciousness also identify then with the source of nature from which they emerge. [...]

[...] The paranoid and the schizophrenic are trying to find meaning in a world they have been taught is meaningless, and their tendencies appear in lesser form throughout society.

No matter where I look, I seem to be
at the center of a world that forms
perfectly around me.
No lopsided vision ever shows
the world spread only to my left,
with my image on the last right edge,
nor has the world
ever appeared just ahead,
while nothingness began
just behind my back.

[...] You are not imprisoned, as you know, within the form that you wear. Now, there is no reason therefore that you should be imprisoned within it when you are finished with that form. [...]

[...] They are inherent abilities that belong to consciousness no matter what form it adopts. [...]

[...] That is wisdom and it does not need words and it formed your intellect. [...]

[...] They appear in much less conspicuous form, often in intuitive decisions made with seeming suddenness, beneficial changes, intuitive hunches. [...] These are all variations of the same experience, though in lesser form.

Such information, such inspired writing, usually appears within frameworks of the personality that have already been set and formed. [...]

Now: Such “new truths” can still be very ancient indeed, but truth is not a thing that must always have the same appearance, shape, form, or dimension. [...]

The voice seemed to finally be formed, or to rise above this static, and on one occasion the voice was extremely loud.

This was the result of my attempt to give the voice an independence, to form sound within your physical system without working through Ruburt’s vocal cords, but to impress your physical system kinetically.

[...] The static was the coming together of the components before the words were formed from them.

Now if you had been present, I could have formed a larger effect which you could have heard clearly.

[...] If the three of you turn your attention to the set, the first one to consider it will form the so-called initial construction. [...] Your construction of the set, Joseph, will involve the use of energy formed into various combinations of atoms and molecules; and these themselves give off vibrations that are received subconsciously, and also serve therefore to give indications of approximate location, bulk, and even particular material and color, to the subconscious mind of any observer, so-called; although he does not see your construction but forms his own, more or less in faithful replica, to what he has subconsciously perceived telepathically from you and any other constructor, from generalized notions of the idea behind the construction, and from vibrations and even impacts received from the atoms and molecules that compose other constructions of the so-called single object.

The physical matter that is the chair, or rather Ruburt’s chair, is formed as I explained, and no atom in it is the same today and tomorrow. [...]

[...] Here we will imagine the weak pattern—form of the hose, and an individual perceiving the generalized pattern. [...]

[...] Rob was getting the groceries form the car so I had no chance to tell him. [...]

We learned the methods
so long ago
that they’re unconscious,
and we’ve hypnotized ourselves
into believing
that we’re the audience,
so I wonder where we served
our apprenticeship.
Under what master magicians did we learn
to form reality
so smoothly that we forgot to tell ourselves
the secret?

[...] There are, latent, within your own physical forms other senses, unused, that could have come to the front but in your probability did not. [...]

[...] You are not only creatures of corporeal being, forming images of flesh and blood, embedded in a particular kind of space and time; you are also creatures rising out of a particularized dimension of probabilities, born from dimensions of actuality richly suited to your own development, enrichment and growth.

[...] But generally speaking, I have simply given you an outline which follows the characteristics of consciousness as it is embarked in physical form. [...]

1. I can note a good deal later that Seth’s material on our making further distinctions in the families of consciousness, beyond the nine he’s already named for us, is certainly related to the passages from a private session that I quoted in the last three paragraphs of Note 8 for the 732nd session: Seth stated that Peter Smith and I “are and are not counterparts” — that with another in this life each of us may often come together, then part, “forming a counterpart relationship when it suits your purposes….”

As I have tried to explain, however, your assumptions about reality do indeed form it. You may literally perceive certain elements of consciousness in a personified form, as spirit guides, angels, or even as gods and goddesses. [...]

[...] From those elements you form your picture of the world. [...]

(“That’s the system,” Connie Lido said when I told her Fred hadn’t told us he’d signed that form. [...]

[...] I’m to mail him all the forms and figures I got from Kim Evans. [...]

[...] I told Pete about Fred signing that form on November 18, saying Jane didn’t require acute care. [...]