“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Thinking that the words referred to the physical condition of the person whose death was foreseen, Ruburt changed them as mentioned in an effort to better the situation. You will see here that indirectly but clearly we have given you the identity of the person whose death is foreseen, particularly when I add to the positive statement, though it may appear negative, that your mother, Joseph, is in no way involved.

This made him more worried that the future death foreseen was his own, since he was looking up at a nurse and doctor while they looked down at him. He heard the words spoken by a nurse, “She is still in shock,” but he distorted the words so that he remembered them as being, “She is coming out of shock.”

Now, the information given automatically changes the nature of the probability that was foreseen, for in that probability no forewarning had occurred. [...]

[...] In telling me this Jane said Callista had foreseen events concerning James’s death. [...]

In all of these instances however there are uncertainties, for probable future events can be foreseen as clearly as events that will more actually occur. [...]

[...] There will be an effect—not one I believe that you have foreseen, and not immediate. [...]

[...] Some were clear-cut and almost exactly matched the foreseen future event. [...]

[...] An event foreseen through precognition or clairvoyance, a future event, may or may not actually occur within time as you know it. [...]

[...] This is why, often, our specific dates do not materialize as given, or why events foreseen do not occur as given. [...]

[...] Of course, we couldn’t possibly have foreseen the great variety of challenges that lay before us. [...]

[...] Not that she doesn’t have her failures, but her work has greatly improved since we met in 1954, and in ways that I hadn’t foreseen for her. [...]