“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(“Is this old hand male or female?”

(First Question: Is this old hand male or female? [...]

[...] And what apelike female changed her genetic messages, knowing that her egg, if it matured, would literally give birth to an entirely new species, one that centuries later would read and write? [...]

The spontaneous self has seen itself in female terms. [...]

To sum up Seth’s somewhat amused comments in the 12th session for January 2, 1964: “Sex, regardless of all your fleshy tales, is a psychic phenomenon, merely certain qualities which you call male and female. [...] When I say as I have that the overall entity, or whole self, is neither male or female, and yet refer [to some] entities by definitely male names such as ‘Ruburt’ and ‘Joseph’ [as Seth calls me] I merely mean that in the overall essence, the [given] entity identifies itself more with the so-called male characteristics than with the female.”

[...] A connection with two other people, I believe male and female.

[...] male and female,” refers to the fact that Jane and I were scheduled to meet a young married couple, friends of ours, later in the afternoon at the Inn. [...]

[...] To her she fails as a female if she cannot hold him in line. [...]

One of the children is suffering to some extent psychologically because of the dilemma, and you are too much the autocrat with this child, a female.

[...] Sarah and Malba were of course female. [...]

(November 30, Monday, 8:15 PM: Quite a few glimpses of male and female faces and figures. [...]

[...] And with your intellect and with your reason, and even I, as bothmale and female, have been married without ceremony and with ceremony and the true marriage has nothing to do with ceremony of that kind. [...]

(“Was Jane a male or female then?”)

(Recently our friend in Boston, Pat Norelli, had visited a female medium who told her that she was under the influence of an evil eye, and would never have a happy day as long as she lived. [...]

[...] [I read later that females and the young live in groups, the adult males usually alone—perfectly suitable accommodations of consciousness for raccoons!] “Coons can’t run fast,” Floyd told us, “and big dogs will attack ‘em if they catch them out in the open in the daytime. [...]

[...] Female. [...]

[...] Before, man had been neither male nor female, combining the characteristics of each, but now the physical bodies also specialized in terms of sexuality. [...]

[...] With my flashlight, he glimpsed a medium-sized coon, but couldn’t tell if it was male or female, or whether it had young. [...]

[...] He left with a few female companions who were also ostracized, and died finally of starvation. [...]

[...] In a couple of essays I discussed, and asked questions about, the roles played by the 200 million to 500 million sperm that don’t make contact with the female egg at the time of conception. [...]

Now a small note: Your poor, misguided, unjolly bachelor friend downstairs did you a service many times, in complementing your wife when you were unable to do so, in giving her a sense or a glimmer of female pride or appreciation when you were unable to communicate, and you knew this.

There is a child, a female, who is seemingly not connected with any of these episodes, who will be important in a man’s decision. [...]

[...] Nor could John tell us anything about a female child, or a Dayton OH connection.

[...] It showed that he was not a frivolous female, fancifully following each stray imaginative trance image. [...]

[...] The tall person here mentioned could be female. [...]