“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

A note of further explanation here. [...]

He began to search actually from childhood in a natural fashion toward some larger framework that would offer an explanation for reality that bore at least some resemblance to the natural vision of his best poetry. [...]

[...] And with this material as a preface I will begin with a brief explanation of the Frank Watts material.

[...] I am aware of the tormenting questions involved in such issues, and also of the gap between my explanations and the daily experiences of many people. [...]

I would like to give you an explanation for last evening’s events, presuming you are both interested. [...]

[...] Most of this refers to your question, and is by way of giving you a fuller explanation.

[...] Then as Jane and I were discussing the episode last Friday night, I found myself saying that one explanation for double dreams — that is, the awareness of experiencing two dreams at once, or a dream within a dream — could be that each half of the brain has its own separate dream, the two dreams then try to emerge together into ordinary consciousness.

This is a rather simplified explanation. [...]

[...] Jane was dissociated as usual, and also quite relieved at Seth’s explanation. [...]

[...] I can give hints and clues and explanations that are quite valid within that context (intently). [...]

[...] I will give you specific material to use along with the book, and will add my own explanations.

[...] She now repeated it again, still without explanation, and later told me that she was aware of resistance concerning the word. [...]

[...] A belief in heaven that is not an obsessional belief can be used as a useful framework, as a basis of operation in which an individual will often accept easily then, the new explanations that will be offered.

[...] You see a species of consciousness, a species that must remain unexplained in any normal explanations of evolution, and these hint at the communications that exist at all levels (intently), protecting not only the genetic references necessary to your own kind, but the combinations [...]

There is, incidentally, a Framework 3 and a Framework 4, in the terms of our discussion—but all such labels are, again, only for the sake of explanation. [...]

The use of drugs even offers a pseudo-scientific explanation for interior events. [...]

[...] This is simply for now a brief explanation.

(Jane feels the voice John heard within can have one of three explanations: It was Seth; it was a subconscious creation on John’s part; it was a telepathic communication, on a subconscious level, from Jane to John.)

[...] The data, and Seth’s explanation of the results, appear in their regular places in the session.

[...] Seth answers those questions and many more, until as we read his explanations we wonder how we could have so misread our own nature as to distrust the very messages meant to lead us toward our own spiritual growth and that of the species as well.