“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Your scientists would learn more about the nature of dreams if they would but train themselves to recall their own dreams, and then study them in relation to their own normal activities and physical events.

[...] These deal with events involving Jane and me at York Beach in August of 1963, preceding the beginning of these sessions by several months.

And a very positive event took place that afternoon. [...]

[...] We talked about the many delays involved in our producing Mass Events and Dreams. She’s “felt good” about finishing Chapter 11 of Dreams a week ago, but has done little on Magical Approach recently, except to reread her rough work for the beginning of that book. [...]

I’d also written in the notes for the last session (of December 1) about our difficulties producing Mass Events, and that Jane has “done little on Magical Approach recently….” [...]

[...] I mean to make clear here that regardless of any complications that may seem only too apparent to you, in the production and distribution of my last book, and Ruburt’s (Mass Events), the benefits far outweigh any disadvantages.

They expect relationships to be rewarding and continuing, and expect each event will have the best possible results. [...]

[...] You try to measure the dimension of dream experience by applying the rules of reality that are your usual criteria for judging events. [...]

(“Several events happening together, or a series of objects strung together on the object.” Probably a reference to the contents of my mother’s writing on the greeting card, since this deals with several events. [...]

The number 4. Several events happening together, or a series of objects strung together on the object. [...]

And incidentally, the events I mentioned in connection with Philip's neighborhood did occur indeed, as a check upon the newspapers might well show.

(“How about a clue as to those events in John’s neighborhood, in Williamsport?”)

[...] And there for the moment events seem to swirl in place—storms of consciousness that, I think, are bound to combine in new patterns to further explore certain large challenges.¹

2. Seth delivered the 823rd session for Mass Events on February 27, 1978—over two years ago. [...]

[...] My own notes contain a detailed chronology of events between my drawing, when we were given the newspaper containing the photo in question, etc. [...]

The events of time in such a case from the outside might seem to change drastically, while those inside our time structures would not notice any change, in a Framework 1 level. [...]

[...] It has been fashionable to blame the subconscious for personality problems and difficulties, the idea being that early events, charged and mysterious, lodged there. [...]

5. I am helpless because I am at the mercy of events from past lives in other incarnations, over which I now have no control. [...]

[...] Certainly the events seemed real, vital, vivid. [...]

[...] I’d felt good yesterday for the first time in a long while, again, and told Jane that even though I’d quite forgotten the problems yesterday, today’s events showed that they hadn’t been solved, but merely temporarily forgotten until triggered again.

A psychic, he thought, should be calm, untouched by physical events, highly disciplined, rather than spontaneous, such as he was, and sensitive to inner moods, which he was. [...]

[...] Such events also release other portions of the body as the effect reverberates, so to speak.

(Jane said that as I read to her, she picked up from Seth information that in those old days people most often insisted upon returning to the sites of their destroyed or damaged cities and towns and farms, even though such events had wiped those places out more than once. [...]

The walking progress is already assured because of inner physical events now occurring. [...]

(“What’s the main world event of the next decade?”)

[...] Jane hasn’t tried to predict similar events. [...]

[...] When it looks, therefore, at the world of political events, the problems seem insoluble. [...]

(9:14.) In the same way, some private-life decisions or events may appear disadvantageous to the intellect for the same reasons, while instead they are also self-corrective measures that you are not able to perceive because of your beliefs. [...]

And: “It’s significant that we apply numbers to time, but as there are unrecognized spaces between numbers, there are unrecognized spaces (psychologically invisible) between or within moments, and some of the events of our bodies are ‘too small’ for us to follow, focused as we are in our prime series. These body events actually are ‘infinitesimal but infinite,’ following their own patterns that merge with ours.”

[...] However, many of these are made up of several related events, figures, et cetera, and so could be legitimately divided further if we chose to do so.¹¹

Children, however, may be quite conscious of the fact that they willed themselves to become ill, in order to avoid school, or an examination, or a coming feared family event. [...]

[...] You may then try to discover what the charged event was, but in such a case your trouble is a belief in guilt itself.

[...] But if the child discovers that a prolonged cry after the event gets extra attention and consideration, then it will begin to extend the emotion.