“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] There is a change in chemicals and hormones, so that he is for now mentally cushioned and relatively unconcerned about events.

[...] To me, redemption means a continuous search or journey, then, involving whatever events and interchanges we choose to create, for whatever purposes, along the way—and truly, I think, some of those purposes will involve things “the conscious mind may not be able presently to perceive.” [...]

[...] This would be the case even when the subject is very unhappy with present challenges, and is trying to assign their origin to events in one or more former existences. [...]

[...] Hook up those two factors with the quite natural concern that at least some events in any life to come will inevitably be unpleasant, or worse, and we have at least three powerful restraints, or psychic blocks, inhibiting awareness of future lives. [...]

We’ve presented lengthy quotations from Seth on his Framework 1 and Framework 2 material both in his Mass Events and in Jane’s God of Jane. His discussions on the subject are an excellent example of how a very creative idea, capable of helping many people, can arise from an attempt to deal with a personal situation—for on September 17, 1977, Seth introduced his Frameworks 1 and 2 concept in a private session designed to help Jane contend with her physical symptoms.

[...] I certainly hoped it didn’t. The session contains an excellent opening line or two that I want to use in a note for Mass Events.

(I’m getting used to thinking about Mass Events now, and am organized to start producing the notes for it—something like making myself a new nest within which I can feel comfortable for working on the new job.

[...] The real work of the dream is done during the event itself, on deep psychic and biological levels.

[...] (Pause.) There will often be chemical imbalances in such a situation, unconsciously produced by the individual, sometimes in order to allow him to work out a series of hallucinatory events. [...]

[...] This event thus meant that for the first time Bill felt an emotional rapport with Seth, although previously he had been intrigued intellectually by the material.

[...] I believe such events lay quite well ahead of us however.

[...] [Checking later, I found that she’d given me the same answer about certain Seth material in Mass Events.]

This meant, of course, a language (pause) that was in its way more precise than your own, for concepts were routinely expressed that described the vast complexity of subjective as well as objective events. [...]

[...] I mention these things because they too play a part in yesterday’s events.)

[...] Your fears, brought to the forefront by the Gallagher episode the week earlier, again surfaced with the event of the chair and Frank’s return. [...]

[...] Again, many events are gathering as the result of our sessions, and certain activities taking place at other levels of activity during what you might think of as our usual session times. [...]

If events continue as they now exist Ruburt can walk normally. [...]

(“A connection with a future event.” Future events are implied by the object through the copy on page 3: “Continuing under new management.”

[...] Experiments and experiences using psychological time, and all projection events, deal rather directly with the use of these inner senses.

[...] A connection with a future event.

[...] And those activities lead into the crux of today’s session and events. [...]

[...] There was also of course the event of St. Vincent’s. Also numerous small abandonments when Ruburt was still younger—but with your help he can indeed clear both mind, body and spirit, for he senses that relief, and knows it is at least within his grasp. [...]

Your own explanation of events from our material, as understood by you, will also now be of important import, as you express them to Ruburt during uneasy times. [...]

[...] These are projected so automatically into physical activities that they are then faced and manipulated as physical events. [...]

The personality attempts to protect itself from them, for the reasons given, but the psychic energy behind them will leap up and attach itself to events. [...]

The feeling then seems to be out of all proportion to whatever current event seems to have evoked it. [...]

[...] However there will be at the very least an emotional connection between the event within dreamer “B’s” dream, that has strong meaning for dreamer “A”. [...]

[...] I believe another person was connected with the event, and that it occurred in afternoon, late, or evening. [...]

[...] Lorraine then began to recall bits and pieces of events which, she thought, might fall within the pattern Seth had been producing in the rest of the data.

A strip, and a connection with an event that was not particularly pleasant. [...]

[...] Without going into personal details, we can say that Seth is correct when he refers to “A connection with an event that was not particularly pleasant”; this involved us and Jane’s father in Florida.

[...] But the event provided us with an obvious clue—any body that can undergo so spontaneous a change can hardly be one that’s permanently fixed in a stiffened condition.... We’ve already obtained some interesting pendulum answers, this morning, about the event, concerning emotional factors that lead to physical restraint. [...]

[...] You cannot understand perceived events unless you understand who perceives them. [...]

[...] At the same time, I was thinking as I wrote that Seth’s sentence, above: “You cannot understand perceived events unless you understand who perceives them,” embodied one of his best ideas in “Unknown” Reality.)

The suggestions we have given so far are predictives; they actually predict dire events of one kind or another, following a given original action.

He was also however symbolic of evil to Ruburt, and to some extent then conquered simply through the natural passage of events. [...]

[...] This application has been after the event in many instances, of course, and we hope to continue to improve in using it in a practical way to forestall various problems.

Events that each of you might have “misinterpreted” in the past were handled quite differently. [...]