“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Within that framework, individually and as a whole, mankind may seem to make errors, to bring ill health, death or desolation upon himself, but he is still using those abilities to create a world.

[...] (Long pause.) It is a great error to segregate some individuals, like some modern colony of lepers.

[...] They are ready to deal with the joy and responsibility that others may not as yet understand, so it is easy enough to make errors. [...]

[...] This is a gross error. [...]

[...] Many of the words were misspelled, some so much so that I crossed them out and quickly tried again — with the humorous result that the corrections also contained errors. [...]

[...] I made many errors talking to Jane, but the vocal difficulty never matched that of the spelling or writing. [...]

[...] While man’s works may often certainly appear destructive, you must not blame man’s intent, nor must you ever make the error of confusing man with his works. [...]

[...] Argue all you want against his works, as you read in your newspapers of errors, stupidities, treachery or war. [...]

[...] Would “errors” of omission be counted? [...]

[...] We thought it most interesting that the data based on Jane’s conscious thoughts proved to be that in error. [...]

This can be compared and correctly to errors in a painting. [...]

The error having to do with the name Philip—the minister at one time in his life was called Phil. [...]

[...] To attack medical corruption, or medical errors, or particular clinics, for example, is within bounds, but to attack the belief system of the entire structure is something else again.

[...] However, you must expect some errors.

[...] He now told me that the rock or stone impression was his error, and not Jane’s, or Ruburt’s.

No, there is an error somewhere … The Bantam cover, despite your obvious dissatisfaction, aids our work in the positive of ways.

[...] Despite the errors that have been made, you did set about to gain the necessary knowledge, and all the episodes in your life have been used in this behalf. [...]

[...] I told you, I believe, that it is an error to think at all in terms of size when fields are mentioned. [...]

Dictation: Your next question is easy to anticipate, of course, for you will want to know the origin of that “interior” universe from which I have said the exterior one ever emerges — and here we must part company with treasured objectivity, and enter instead a mental domain, in which it is seen that contradictions are not errors; an inner domain large enough to contain contradictions at one level, for at another level they are seen to be no contradictions at all.

[...] The issue at Prentice, then, has been charged, not simply because of the errors made there, or abroad, but because of what those errors and stupidities represented to you—their symbolic content. [...]

Identical realities, therefore, do not exist, and any such appearances should be a tip-off that an error has been made.

In that larger picture (underlined) there are no errors, for each action, pleasant or not, will (underlined) in its fashion be redeemed, both in relationship to itself and in relationship to a larger picture that the conscious mind may not be able presently to perceive. [...]

[...] You did not make any “errors” with “Unknown” Reality. For one thing, there were no errors to be made.