“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] (Mark is Bill’s entity name.)

I had some pertinent remarks to make this evening, and since Philip (Seth’s entity name for John Bradley) is indeed a friend, I shall feel free to make them, although they are somewhat of a personal nature, and directed to you and our reluctant medium.

([Bill, an entity channeled by Joel H.:] “Part of letting it ride was what caused the difficulty in the first place and the yelling was a release of emotion and we have met before. [...]

[...] Seth referred to me as Ruburt and to Rob as Joseph, saying that these were our entity names. The entity is the whole self who experiences many reincarnations. [...]

[...] Also, the divisions are arbitrary to a large degree, for they can indeed be carried further, for example, to the entity.

Now, I did not speak earlier, and I have not spoken directly before to Lafinda, and Lafinda is the entity name for Vera. [...]

(It will be remembered that Mark is Bill Macdonnel's entity name. [...]

(Philip, of course, is the entity name for John Bradley, of Williamsport, PA, who has witnessed several sessions.

As I mentioned in Seth Speaks, the Christ entity was too great to be contained in any one man, or for that matter in any one time, so the man you think of as Christ was not crucified (See chapters Twenty-one and Twenty-two of Seth Speaks.)

[...] The Christ entity desired to be born in space and time, to straddle creaturehood in order to serve as a leader, and to translate certain truths in physical terms.

[...] That organism is intimately connected to the natural biological state of each other person, and to each other living thing, or entity, however minute.

Jane has great energy and power at her disposal when speaking for Seth, and I can often feel those qualities as though they form a collective palpable entity in itself. [...]

The creativity of any given entity is endless, and yet all of the potentials for experience will be explored. [...]

[...] All of the potentials of the entity are also actualized.

(“Well,” I said after discussing the session with her, “it’s my understanding that our whole self or entity experiences a group of simultaneous physical lives in various historical periods, and that in ordinary terms we think of those lives as following one after another. [...]

(Seth’s entity or larger personality spoke for the session. [...]

[...] She believes it has to do with the electrical makeup of the entity itself.)

[...] According to Seth, each of us has counterparts in other systems of reality; not identical selves or twins, but other selves who are part of our entity, developing abilities in a different way than we are here.

[...] Do you feel lost in the face of all these ideas of entities and probable selves? [...]

[...] We’ve learned to our sorrow and rage that both entities have cut their versions of Seth Speaks, without our permission or knowledge, and have struggled to exert what force we could in order to rectify the situation. [...]

[...] I believe that Jane at last understands that I’m quite capable of reacting that way, that I would refuse to indefinitely put up with our present kind of hassles with Prentice-Hall, or any other entity. [...]

[...] The entity follows this rule through the cycle of reincarnations. [...]

[...] It will finally understand that it is not to be dumped aside but taken along as itself, independent as always, to stand beside other independent egos that all represent facets of the entity.

[...] He (as Seth sometimes addresses Jane, because of her male entity name, Ruburt) progresses at a certain rate, for example, and encounters some blockages, due to doubts and fears. [...]

[...] Note that no break was announced, as is often the case when Seth’s larger personality or entity speaks. [...]

([Arnold:] “This dispersion of consciousness, is it the whole entity or just this portion of it?”)

[...] It is the way that the universe expands and it is the way that entities form. [...]

Now: Each reader is a portion of his or her own entity, and is developing toward the same kind of existence that I know. [...]

[...] There is, in other words, a give and take between souls or entities, and no end of possibilities, both of development and expansion. [...]