“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Your emotions follow your beliefs. [...]

[...] As usual when Seth Two speaks, the end was unannounced, and came without any of the warmth and emotional exchange that often involves Seth, Jane, and me.

[...] This is one of the main reasons why they strike out at strongly integrated personalities, and why it is so easy for them to be catapulted by raw emotion into tragedies of this sort.

[...] Not so much in interpretation as the fact that some terms may be negatively suggestive, or that you may put emotional connotations where they do not belong.

[...] Since it was a photo of me I felt it would have an emotional attraction for her.

[...] A personality, or personalized energy, is never destroyed; but transformation of form remains a necessity for continuation of each personality, and in some cases an emotional denial on the part of the living, of this fact, can lead to resistance in so far as the personality of those no longer connected with the physical field. [...]

[...] I knew at once that the tape’s contents were so revealing of her feelings about her illness, so disturbing and frightening, that she couldn’t bring herself to explore those deep emotions at that time. [...]

[...] There will be room for emotional interactions within the family that are now impossible. [...]

There may well be emotional charges expressed. [...]

[...] Or the projecting personality must be either driven by high emotional intensity to make himself known, or be of exceptional ability.

The emotional impact behind them determines their strength. [...]

[...] It is somewhat like having to disentangle a particular word from a strong emotional association. [...]

[...] The numbers refer to November 1963; during this month Linda was involved in a strong emotional experience that was unique for her.

There’s also a rather unexpected bonus: Not only is the mail being answered much more quickly, but the students involved are gaining experience in dealing with a variety of intellectual and emotional questions posed by people they’ve never met. [...]

“My only touch of emotion was involved with this second image; as I first saw it, I felt light thrillings in my body, coupled with a somewhat fearful reaction. [...]

[...] In black and white print, this sounds ridiculous, yet, emotionally, the statement has a logic that speaks louder than all my deliberate suggestions to the contrary. [...]

[...] I do not pick up any strong emotional attachment between him and the object.

[...] She had a strong awareness of Seth’s benevolent emotional feeling.)

[...] At the same time you were determined to set yourself apart from the world to some extent, while still maintaining and developing an emotional contact with a mate that would be unlike any in your earlier experience. [...]

[...] The interesting thing about Seth’s statement is that with counterpart theory in mind one can gain a fresh appreciation of how underlying emotions and motives flow among certain individuals, sometimes surfacing in feelings of dislike, for instance, to whatever degree. [...]