“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] As far as I could tell, they were perfectly solid and fully three-dimensional. [...]

[...] This will be true portrait work—the personality as seen in more than three-dimensional terms. [...]

[...] That is, fifth dimensional space is not an emptiness to be filled, being itself alive and vibrant, and changing its outer nature according to the plane which is composed of it.

[...] Who else did we know, so “old school” who’d even speak of tipping one’s hat, or refer to food as “good cuisine?” Anyway he certainly didn’t sound frightening, and the fifth-dimensional monologue was really provocative.

[...] Your scientists presently have little idea of what this means, for comparatively speaking they conceive of energy in one-dimensional terms. [...]

[...] Because personality is multi-dimensional, it cannot be discussed under one heading alone, and in explaining it, Seth uses a method that is almost multidimensional itself. [...]

[...] The other “dream” experienced simultaneously was, instead, your muddled interpretation of vital experienced reality on the part of another portion of yourself, in another reality entirely; a dimensional bleed-through. [...]

[...] It was multi-dimensional rather than flat, and she could tell there were symbols or markings on it. [...]

The Sumari therefore appear in or intrude into the three-dimensional system from other dimensions.

[...] The true dimensions of a divine creativity would be unendurable for any one consciousness of whatever import, and so that splendor is infinitely dimensionalized (most intensely throughout), worlds spiraling outward with each ‘moment’ of a cosmic breath; with the separation of worlds a necessity, and with individual and mass comprehension always growing at such a rate that All That Is multiplies itself at microseconds, building both pasts and futures and other time scales you do not recognize. [...]

During that experience I knew that we formed physical matter, not the other way around; that our senses showed us only one three-dimensional reality out of an infinite number that we couldn’t ordinarily perceive; that we could trust our senses only so far and only so long as we did not ask questions that were beyond their limited scope of knowledge.

I hope this material is as interesting to you as for example our fifth dimensional imaginary apparatus. [...]

[...] These dream images are not one-dimensional cardboard figures by any means. [...]

[...] I saw the universe or whole reality, an infinity of spirals and stars, in multi-dimensional depth. [...]

[...] In the same way the world as you see it is a reflection of what you are, a reflection not in glass but in three-dimensional reality. [...]

The reason should be apparent; if you consider for the sake of analogy, you may think of our fifth dimensional space once more. [...]

[...] Pulling one out, I was surprised at the vivid colors in the drawing, and the marvelous three-dimensional form it contained. [...]

[...] Now, that sort of thing is a dim shadow, in three-dimensional terms, dealing with one planet, of a much more vast system. [...]

Women exceed men in such areas as finger dexterity; accounting aptitudes; rate of idea flow, as in sales, writing, and teaching; observing small changes in physical detail; non—tangible ideas requiring complex vocabulary, as in medicine and law; the ability to visualize three-dimensional relationships, as in engineering.

[...] We may be responding to the gods in ourselves — those inner sparks of knowing that defy our own three-dimensional knowledge.