“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(With some dry amusement:) Now: I myself have heard it said that all other species preserve nature, while man has a propensity for destroying it.

[...] And I think that in its way each life form must know that and love its home, and has no desire to change or destroy it.

[...] “Your joints are destroyed,” Dr. Mandali told Jane, after getting the opinion of the young out-of-town rheumatologist she’d asked to examine my wife. [...]

Fundamentalists think of nuclear power as a force that God might use, say, to destroy the world. [...]

[...] If, and this is impossible, all portions but the most minute last unit of All That Is were destroyed, All That Is could still continue, for within the smallest portion is the innate knowledge of the whole.

One and one makes nothing.
Arithmetic destroys us all.
Subtraction is the answer
To our hypothesis.

[...] No natural elements will destroy them, yet they will only be observed by those who can understand them. [...]

Your father cut out his own world, you felt, in his house and in the wilderness, comparatively speaking, but at the same time because you feared him so you did not really feel he wanted you to do the same no matter what he said—because to prove yourself a better man would automatically destroy him.

Your own personality as you know it, that portion of you that you consider most precious, most uniquely you, will also never be destroyed or lost. [...]

[...] When you are considering the human personality as a thing of this time only and destroyed by death, then its disintegration for any reason seems truly a tragic thing. [...]

Nevertheless, when you think in terms of the entity and its various personality manifestations throughout your earth time then you realize that the basic self, the entity, cannot be destroyed in any particular earth life. [...]

[...] When you dissect the frog you destroy that which you had been seeking. [...]

[...] When you fear that man will most certainly destroy himself through his misuse of technologies, then you are expressing the same feeling in different form expressed by the religious attitude—only religion’s devils are turned into technological devices. [...]

[...] They destroyed it through their own error, and here reincarnated when your planet was prepared. [...]

[...] She could destroy your other brother. [...]

[...] There are leaping, explosive, volatile, rapidly altering relationships in which psyche touches psyche, forms an attraction or mutual response that can be both eternal and fleeting, never destroyed or forgotten, there as a trace or as an overwhelming experience.

[...] Those who persist, therefore, in shielding their truths from questions threaten to destroy the validity of their knowledge.

[...] Our friend was convinced that one of the three of us must be destroyed, and he feared mightily that he would be the victim.

Selves are not destroyed. [...]

You are aware of the nonsense connected with artists and poets and so forth—that they are too sensitive for the world, that great talent brings spiritual desolation, and that a man’s genius more often destroys him than fulfills him. [...]

[...] Now this is a creative process where the personality uses for its advantage and development those elements in its background that it seems (underlined) could have destroyed it.

[...] Its old fashioned predecessor had been destroyed by Tropical Storm Agnes in June 1972; see my notes for the 613th session in Chapter 1 of Personal Reality.

[...] Your own consciousness leaves the body almost in the same way that messages leap the nerve ends.¹³ The consciousness is not destroyed in the meantime.