“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(Pause at 9:26.) This means that you deal, even consciously, with vast areas of probabilities, with various combinations, with ways in which identity itself will be defined and experienced. [...]

The overly conscientious self defines good in rather narrow terms, and no effort has been made to reeducate it, or very little. [...]

[...] Words in a language function not only by defining what a specific object is, for example, but also by defining what it is not.⁴

Indeed, as for my not defining terms, it is impossible not to define terms.

[...] Your system has frowned upon many experiences, considering them eccentric behavior in an adverse fashion, since your belief systems have so regimented behavior, and so narrowly defined sanity. [...]

[...] They cannot be simply defined. [...]

(11:33.) The ability to dream presupposes the existence of experience that is not defined as physical fact. [...]

No one from any psychological threshold, however vast, can write a book that defines the psyche, but only present hints and clues, words and symbols. [...]

Your education tells you that all of that is nonsense, that the world is defined by its physical aspects alone. [...]

(Now here, Jane told me later, she began moving into a different, hard-to-define, “strange” state of altered awareness. [...]

[...] There are times when all probabilities point in one direction, and I believe there is a mathematical theorem, a theoretical one, that defines such occurrences. [...]

Now: Dictation … Each probability system has its own set of “blueprints,” clearly defining its freedoms and boundaries, and setting forth the most favorable structures capable of fulfillment.

[...] Each has its purpose, though that purpose cannot be easily defined in your terms. [...]

[...] The form of the particle defines your experience as the waves permeate it, but your greater reality cannot be expressed in such limited terms.

Now: all in all, the overall systems of conventional belief are relatively simple, and serve to define reality by numbering as truths or facts certain kinds of events, therefore accepting them as legitimate furniture for the mind. [...]

[...] The main issue, again, is to reassure that one important portion of Ruburt’s personality that the self is not sinful, not bad or evil, and to show it the limited nature of the framework that so defined it. [...]

[...] In larger terms, however, each individual suffers whenever identity is defined primarily as a matter of sexual orientation.

[...] Part of all this is due to the original aspect of your work itself, which does not have any well-defined definitions. [...]

[...] The color however, its value of intensity, served to further refine and define — for example, either by reinforcing the message already given by the objective value of the lines, angles, and curves, and by the invisible word messages already explained; or by modifying these in any given number of ways. [...]

[...] The complexes and neuroses outlined and defined are products of your traditions and beliefs. [...]