“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(4:45.) In other words, Ruburt was given strong creative abilities that he was determined to express — but at the same time early in his life he was given the idea that it was highly dangerous to express the very uniqueness that was inherent in his creativity. [...]

[...] (Getting well after the danger period had passed was no problem!)

[...] In times of danger your entire body must be able to move swiftly. [...]

Because the father freezes emotion in the ritual of fussy compulsion he is actually less dangerous in some ways and more dangerous in others, since the compulsive framework always threatens to explode. [...]

For Ruburt’s benefit, there is indeed no danger of immobility as in his mother’s case.

(Pause.) You had some time ago an old newspaper article you had saved, on the dangers of using the words “should” or “would” too often—and there is perhaps nothing else you could do that is as detrimental to the true development of the natural self. [...]

There are, however, classic connections between creative thought and heresy, between established belief and the danger of revelatory material as being disruptive—first of church and then of state. [...]

This is entirely different from Ruburt’s attempt with his creature, for he was trying to form an evil creature, in those terms, to slay—a thing conscious of its own evil in those terms, and that is always dangerous. [...]

[...] (Pause.) In a way, some disease states help to insure the survival of the species — not by weeding out the sickly but by introducing into large numbers of individuals the conditions needed to stabilize other strains within the species that need to be checked, or to “naturally inoculate” the species against a sensed greater danger.

[...] You were in danger of following your old patterns of reaction, which is why I am giving this information. [...]

[...] Man could exult in nature’s energy, power, and splendor, even in the midst of the most fierce storm —in which, indeed, his life might be in danger.

[...] I mentioned earlier that the rewards, the challenges and the dangers exist precisely because so much freedom is allowed.

Touching is considered so basically sexual that the most innocuous touching of any portion of the body by another person is considered potentially dangerous. [...]

[...] As contacts with the world are lessened, however, there is little feedback, so that the “dangers” of the world can easily become exaggerated—and little experience is gained in dealing with the far more mundane aspects of such contact.

Behind all of this is the feeling that exposure is dangerous, that your true feelings must be hidden, and that the world is unsafe—hence your need for defenses. [...]

[...] He said Bill’s personal ideas were good ones; the inherent danger with them had to do with the type of salesman’s personality, the feeling of superiority and of having power over others, that might color the use of computers. [...]

[...] A great danger at this particular time would be that an admission of the saucer’s existence would, strangely enough, serve to unite the far-left and far-right extremist groups in this country. [...]

[...] He grew up at a time when it was considered somewhat dangerous to be different from others. [...]

[...] There were reasons then not (underlined) to go out into the world: it was dangerous, and so forth. [...]

This response to fear is a danger to psychic work, where freedom is necessary. [...]

[...] However, to consider impulses as chaotic, meaningless — or worse, detrimental to an ordered life — represents a very dangerous attitude indeed; an attempt that causes many of your other problems, an attempt that does often distort the nature of impulses. [...]