“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Do not accept without some critical analysis however, though I do not believe that you will. [...]

[...] Therefore if you had criticisms about his work, if you did not like it, you would not love him.

[...] You made a pact not to discuss troublesome, frightening or critical problems, particularly those which did not seem to have an immediate solution.

[...] You can make logical deductions when you discuss what happened, and you can be as critical as you want to be. [...]

[...] How many of them, after criticizing their elders, look inward into their own hearts? [...]

[...] Ruburt’s own old suggestion—be critical in your dreams of your dreams. [...]

It does not involve criticizing creative abilities of your own by comparing them to others that you think you should possess.

[...] Jane and me, Prentice-Hall, the world, critics, the post office?”

[...] Here she has the symptoms as a kind of protection, so I’m wondering about our reactions if we took steps that would put us more in the public eye—left us open to more criticism—as well as praise—for instance. [...]

[...] Once you had it here, for all of your criticism. [...]

[...] On a few occasions he found it negative early in the game, but any criticism later of his relationship with publishers was taken to be a symbol of an anger with him because of his books, period.

[...] He becomes a sponge for numberless such attitudes, only to him they become critically immediate. [...]

[...] In Ruburt’s other books his critical prose frames interior events, but in Dialogues there is no such frame. [...]

[...] On the other hand he fears your disapproval and criticism, and thinks you will look for flaws, and so he lets matters stand there.

[...] With the best of intent most public health announcements shout the symptoms of critical diseases to the skies, so that the smallest of indispositions becomes the trigger for personal fear on the part of millions. [...]

[...] But these portions are as critical and even as intellectual and as waking and as valid and as real as the consciousness with which you are ordinarily familiar. [...]

[...] The critical period is over because of his recognition of the problem and his determination to face and solve it.

[...] Again, the images marked the critical culmination of your destructive energies. [...]

[...] Now it is that idealized self he is seeing in his mind that should find it so easy and natural to triumph in the public arena, solve people’s problems, always be compassionate and understanding, and certainly not critical of mankind’s foibles. [...]

[...] The self could be trusted least of all, however, so that Ruburt felt a necessity to criticize his procedure and performance, lest he was leading you and he both down a Freudian garden path.