“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

“Maybe Seth means a symbolic creation?” I said. [...]

[...] The emotional charge provides the pattern and impetus for such creations. [...]

[...] Your own temporal creations add to the abilities with which you made them. You learn through your creations. [...]

[...] Since we’ve always wanted to make sure that our “psychic work” is given within the context of our daily living, I’ve undertaken to present in these essays intensely personal material relevant to the creation of Dreams. (The mechanics of Jane’s still-fascinating trance phenomenon have been described in some detail in the six previous Seth books she’s produced—with my help—and they’ll also be referred to, if briefly, in Dreams.)

[...] I wonder whether the mouth was a more or less conscious creation to explain the vigorous feeling sweeping through me.)

[...] You give probable selves a foundation and history and identity, and without your creation of them they would not exist. [...] All existence is vulnerable … to the possibilities and probabilities of creation that dwell deeply with it. [...]

[...] You do not need to feel guilty over the creation of any probable selves. [...]

[...] The inner self realizes the nature of its own reality, is sure of its identity and well aware of its power in the creation of actions which it projects outward from itself.

2. My existence enriches all other portions of life, even as my own being is enhanced by the rest of creation.

[...] Seth may be as much of a creation as his book is. [...]

“Perhaps what we are has always waited, hidden in the possibilities of creation, dispersed and unknowing — in the rain and wind that swept across Europe in the thirteenth century — in the heaving mountain ranges — in the clouds that rushed through the skies of other times and places. [...]

“This may be the kind of play in which the ‘gods’ indulge, from which creations grow, sprawling out in all directions. [...]

[...] She drew some of the typefaces either designed or approved by that large, male, “earlier” creation of her whole self. [...]

So here’s to each one of us, willingly caught up as we are in the brilliance of this “now” even when we may think we’re not, exploring our individual and joint creation of reality in all of those uncountable variations that result in a seamless whole. [...]

[...] The same desire in the dreaming state, however, may lead to the instant creation of such a house as far as your dream experience is concerned. [...]

3. In Chapter 14 of The Seth Material, Jane and Seth gave a humorous-serious account of her out-of-body encounter with a demon, or “black thing,” of her own creation.

In other words, these concepts, so natural to all of creation, have not been practiced by humanity in anything like their pure form. [...]

[...] I am saying that the basic structure involving the constant conception of one life form by another serves the purposes of continuing creation.

When it is followed without the addition of unrestrained and purposely cruel purposes having nothing to do with the basic necessity, arrival and departure then can be seen as the two faces of male and female, each serving the basic purpose of value fulfillment and creation.

[...] Your bodies then were relegated to nature and your souls to God, who stood immaculately apart from His creations.

[...] Your orderly sciences stress the chaotic and accidental theories of creation. [...]

[...] They also act as transformers, and provide much of the generating energy that makes creation continuous in your terms. [...]

[...] Is there any way to distinguish between illusion and reality other than by a creation of my own mind?”)

[...] The creator is within its creations, and the creations themselves are gifted with creativity. [...]

Now, if you had all been really paying attention to what I have been saying for some time about the simultaneous nature of time and existence, then you would have known that the theory of evolution is as beautiful a tale as the theory of Biblical creation. [...]

(I think it more than a coincidence that in these excerpts from Seth Speaks, Seth mentions Darwin’s theory of evolution and the Biblical story of creation in the same sentence, for those systems of belief represent the two poles of the controversy over origins in our modern Western societies: the strictly Darwinistic, mechanistic view of evolution, in which the weakest of any species are ruthlessly eliminated through natural, predatory selection, and the views of the creationists, who hold that God made the earth and all of its creatures just as described in the Bible.

8. Very briefly, for those who are interested: It’s often been shown mathematically that contrary to Darwinistic belief, enormous time spans (in the millions of years, say) will not aid in the chance formation of even the chemical precursors to life — the protein or nucleic acid molecules — but will instead make their creation even less likely. [...]

[...] They also forget, or don’t understand, that being the way we are led to the creation of our work. [...]

Creation and perception are far more intimately connected than any of your scientists realize.

[...] Yet through all of this immense, continuous creation, there is always a personal sense of continuity: You never really lose your way in the distance between one moment and the next —