“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Jane broke off at once to speak in a conversational tone. [...]

[...] But conversely, the dream world is a necessity for the continued existence of the physical individual.

(To me, in answer, evidently, to some of our conversation before the session:) You are already writing a book—you— in Framework 2. It simply waits for the proper conditions here. [...]

[...] Ruburt can transcribe the tape, and you and I (voice abruptly louder) will have a pleasant conversation.

[...] There was a reason why there was no session last evening, and if you listen to the conversation, and if you understand the nature of suggestion as thoroughly as you should and must, then you will understand the reason. [...]

[...] Another undifferentiated layer follows, this time marked quite definitely by voices, conversations, or images, as consciousness tunes in more firmly to other communications. [...]

(Now Seth went into material that Jane had touched upon during our conversation last Saturday evening, in addition to giving her dictated information.)

4. Plato, the Greek philosopher, poet, and logician, lived from about 427 to about 347 B.C. Throughout his mature life he treated what he considered to be man’s God-given ideas in a series of Dialogues, or free conversations.

[...] Dream periods provide that service, of course, so that in dreams the two egos can meet and merge to some extent, comparing notes like strangers who perhaps meet on a train at night, and are amazed to discover, after some conversation, that they are indeed close relatives, each embarked upon the same journey though seemingly they travelled alone.

[...] Ruburt has more than appreciated your support, and in fact you have indeed inspired him, so your conversation earlier upset him considerably.

(As we were eating lunch today Jane said she thought Seth would discuss the question of good and evil, re our conversation on those subjects the other day. [...]

[...] I heard many snatches of a conversation between my mother and father, and I had one clear very brief glimpse of the back of my father’s head and shoulders as he pushed through a screen doorway. [...]

[...] She did not see either one of them; and like me, while the experience had some duration, Jane could not retain the gist of their conversation.)

[...] In accidental ways that would be quite humorous if they weren’t so personal, we’ve also learned what negative ideas others can have about us: A person will inadvertently reveal to us, during a conversation, or in a letter or over the telephone, the unflattering opinions his or her mate, or parents, or friends, really have of Jane and me and the work we’re engaged in with the Seth material.

[...] Then of course we’re greeted with polite smiles; the conversation may touch upon the weather, but hardly ever upon matters psychic. [...]

(In recent days we’ve had several conversations about Frameworks 1 and 2, and these have apparently begun to show results. [...]

Your conversations, your drives, your mail, the television programs you watch—all of these are involved—involved in that you will be led to watch programs, for example, that in one way or another help the entire picture. [...]

[...] Conversely, the boundaries do exist when they are thought to exist.

(There was class conversation about the “circle” after which Rachel spoke of the possibility of not coming to classes anymore.)

[...] Now, from a waking state, you do not understand how your dream bodies can seem to fly through the air, defy space and even time, converse with strangers and so forth. [...]

[...] Conversely, if you are fifty and still believe that youth is the one glorious and effective part of a lifetime, you are of course doing the same thing.

They certainly have a reality in energy, and they aid in the conversion of energy into physical terms. [...]