“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

A scientist who would threaten the very survival of life on the planet in order to increase life’s conveniences (underlined) is, however, truly displaying ludicrous behavior (with irony).

[...] Some of the divisions between different portions of the self, therefore, are not basically necessary but are the result of custom and convenience.

[...] (As mentioned earlier, there is no precise point of death, but I am speaking as if there is for the sake of your convenience.)

[...] It is in some ways convenient that you are not consciously aware of each breath that you take. [...]

[...] It is however a connective, a portion of one of the inner senses, which we will call for convenience the second inner sense.

[...] I am using these terms merely for your convenience. [...]

[...] It is simply a matter of new orientation, and doing without certain props that are basically unimportant, but practically extremely convenient; such props as the divisions of sensation, fenced in from each other by pickets of minutes.

[...] I said it was essential that we communicate to that personification [named by Seth for convenience’s sake only] that its performance was quite destructive to Jane, and that it must release its hold. [...]

[...] Sometimes when you are awake, and it is convenient, imagine that your present experience of the moment is a dream, and is highly symbolic. [...]

[...] As early man functioned on his own, without writing or any of the other modern conveniences of communication that we have, so does Jane function through Seth. [...]

[...] It is almost impossible to speak of a single, simple action, though I may do so for convenience’s sake.

[...] You would be if the rest of the week were cleared—and it would be cleared if you realized that what was involved was simply a matter of your own quite natural working habits and convenience, and made it clear that people were welcome at another time.

[...] Again, we speak of the ego and the subconscious as separate merely for the sake of convenience. [...]

[...] However, as you know I speak only for convenience, for there are no real barriers to separate these layers. [...]

I am speaking now for your convenience simply. [...]

[...] My friends are understandably worried concerning the convenience and opinion of their neighbors, and therefore I shall not carry this insignificant display any further than I have at this point.

[...] Only portions of the session are given here, and I’ve rearranged them — and Sue’s notes — a bit for convenience’s sake. [...]

This has to do also with larger events that you might for convenience’s sake think of for now as psychological objects—that is, events seen and recognized by large numbers of people in the same way that objects are.

I would suggest Joseph, that when you find the time, or if you can coerce Ruburt into doing it for you, insert here for any reader’s convenience a copy of the early material, in which I set up the imagined structure of mazes.

[...] The classical conception of the typical atom as being composed of a neat nucleus of indivisible protons and neutrons circled by electrons is largely passé, although for convenience’s sake we may still describe the atom that way. [...]

[...] I am not trying here, now, to judge this portion—herein after called “it” for convenience—or to say that it is going to vanish forever, or release its hold overnight. [...]