“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] She also knew of my questions about counterparts that I’d come up with as a result of my work on The “Unknown” Reality: were Jane and I counterparts; and, to resolve a contradiction—in two different sessions in that book, were George Rhoads and I counterparts, or weren’t we? [...]

[...] This is a direct contradiction of deep biological knowledge, to say nothing of spiritual truth. [...]

(I’ll have to admit that when Seth was speaking I wasn’t sure whether he was contradicting himself or not—first talking about my accusing Jane, then commending me....

[...] I wondered if this was a contradiction, because on the phone last month, Dr. K. had said Jane’s thyroid function was almost up to par from the medication she had been taking, meaning that it had acted quicker than “weeks away.”....)

[...] Many of these new facts contradict respected old facts, and are leading to previously unheard of, or rejected, questions having to do with internal structures for such near-dimensionless processes as the electron, which moves about the atomic nucleus, and for the various “heavier” particles that make up the nucleus itself.

[...] Often there will be contradictions readily apparent. [...]

None of your abilities contradict each other, or oppose each other, or minimize each other, or in any way negate any of your probable accomplishments. [...]

I have given some material on that before, and it all applies, as given, to contradictions in your own beliefs between the male as breadwinner and the male as artist. [...]

It is literally impossible for you, and it is a logistic contradiction to imagine, with your physical structures, that any perception can be received unless the perceiver’s own inner situation is altered. [...]

[...] You do not follow urges through that would hurt others physically, or that seem in direct contradiction to your present beliefs — but you do acknowledge them. [...]

[...] This is not a contradiction nor a distortion. [...]

[...] If these ideas were followed individually and collectively, then the evidence of your physical senses would find no contradiction. [...]

[...] We speculated about the inevitable contradictions that would emerge should man ever manage to achieve such an “ideal” state, or society — for, given, his always restless and creative nature, he’d immediately start changing his supposed utopia. [...]

Where do you find a contradiction?

[...] This must be done however in Framework 2—in other words, in quiet moments when you recognize when you are dealing at another level, so that you feel no contradiction with Ruburt’s Framework 1 behavior. [...]

He must avoid contradictions, while at the same time not putting his normal walking into some distant future. [...]

[...] Now, there is no contradiction here with what I have said about spontaneity. [...]

That approach does indeed fly in direct contradiction to the learned methods you have been taught. [...]

[...] I see this as a contradiction of the notion that the individual is entirely at the mercy of his or her history and of nature. [...]

Before too long you may have reason to check upon what I have said, for records will appear that seem to contradict previous ones — as indeed they shall — and because of the reasons just given.