“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

As for children, I do not consider 15-year-olds children. [...]

[...] But, all of these inner psychological realities color your expectations, just as Ruburt is entirely convinced that a writer of real merit cannot bear children.

[...] Ruburt’s idea of taking the children’s classes at the gallery is a good one. [...] The salesman’s ability of Ruburt’s will serve him well in the children’s classes. [...]

[...] [She and Dougie are Loren’s children.]

[...] A small segment this evening on television gave you a picture of the confused activity that can take place in exaggerated situations—the segment dealing with the abused children, for there you have parents reacting in the worst possible way to the religious dictums as interpreted by “Sinful Selves.” [...]

[...] Some of last night’s dream material dealt with the ideas, again, of creativity—sometimes seen as harmless enough for children, as in the play Ruburt remembered taking part in his Catholic public school. [...]

New sentence: For example, many of the young believe at one time or another that their parents are omnipotent — a very handy belief that gives children a sense of security. [...]

[...] A belief that has positive results for a woman of twenty will not necessarily have the same effect for a woman of forty, who, for example, may still pay far more attention to her children than her husband.

[...] Frank avoided that kind of behavior with his children, but did not fully surmount the pattern as far as his own father was concerned.

[...] The dreams of children could be investigated in this way and compared with those of adults. Children dream vividly and more often. [...] In deep periods of sleep, children range further away, as far as dream activities are concerned.

[...] Therefore, children have more of this ‘chemical propellant’ to use in dream formation. [...]

([Janice:] “Set up for our children or ourselves?”)

(To Gert.) Now there is much better communication between you and your children. [...]

(To Janice.) There is much better communication between you and your children but not as yet between you and your husband. [...]

[...] When children play ring-around-the-rosy, they form living circles in the air. [...]

[...] The atoms and molecules, like the children, enjoy their motion — solidly sketched in space from your perspective, however, with no “idea” that you consider that motion a chair, or so use it.

[...] If the services necessary to extend life are free — paid for by the government, that is — will government decide that certain families simply cannot be allowed to have children, that they’ll be left to die out? [...]

[...] Some of you have physical children as well—but you will all “one day” also be the mental parents of dream children who also waken in a new world, and look about them for the first time, feeling isolated and frightened and triumphant all at once. [...]

There was no normal (underlined) give and take in a family with siblings, where equals—children—could more or less safely express themselves between themselves.

[...] You were, and to some extent are, resentful of women, and would not have married a woman who bore you children.

[...] Contact between children and parents was at a very high level, and children were acutely uncomfortable if out of the sight of their parents for any amount of time.

[...] I am not saying that children do not have a sexual nature from birth. [...]

[...] Your beliefs blind you to the sexual nature of children. [...]

[...] A trader, a merchant, four children. [...]

[...] Never think that you and Ruburt do not have children, for you are closer to many individuals than their parents, and you provide an emotional creativity that will enable physical parents to communicate far better with their offspring.

[...] A trader, a merchant, four children. [...]

[...] As stated before, children are mentioned in the Ceylon eye bank article in column one on page 11, of the full page from which the item was taken. [...] Quote from the article: the ophthalmologist … said the recipients would be… Vietnamese civilians, mostly children, etc.

[...] This could imply something lost, and toy could imply a gift or children perhaps. [...]

(The article states that a gift of eyes for cornea grafts… for South Vietnamese civilians, mostly children… with no discrimination… and some Viet Cong… would be made. [...]

(9:47.) The two of you do not have children, yet you do indeed not only have mental children, but you are—if you will forgive the term—psychic or mental parents to many thousands of people. [...]

[...] Though you do not have children, the two of you do indeed possess a unique relationship, and that in itself is an achievement. [...]

They contained within themselves intense and yet blurred talents that were used as energy sources by the children. [...]

[...] But through having children your father brought about the birth of emotional existence, fullbodied and alive, in sons.³

[...] In 1922 he took his wife and children (I was 3 years old, Linden not yet 2) on a six-month motor trip from the East Coast to California. [...]

[...] There are more “coincidences” involved than those Seth described tonight, none of them consciously known to Jane and me before the Sayre adventure: Mr. Markle is in a nursing home but a few miles from where we live in Elmira, and my mother spent her last days in a similar home less than 15 miles away; one of Mr. Markle’s children lives in Elmira, and is connected with a store Jane and I have visited; Mr. Johnson, of the real estate couple that conducted us about in Sayre, did sign painting and truck lettering as a younger man, as I did; he and I had several mutual acquaintances in Sayre, among them an older artist of some reputation — and now deceased — that we had known in our high school days; and so forth.

[...] From my grade-school days I thought I remembered the house’s large living room especially; for the Markles had raised two children who were contemporary with my next youngest brother and me; sometimes the four of us met at the house, then went to school together.

[...] (Later I found several old photographs of it in one of our family albums, and was reminded that in those days the streets had no curbs.) Even today I can recall most of the families, and their children, who’d lived in the immediate area. [...]

[...] Ruburt sought out men who would not insist upon children. [...]