2 results for (book:ur2 AND session:732 AND stemmed:respons)

► UR2 Appendix 25: (For Session 732) counterparts Norma Herriman Peter Granger
¶11

(But individual reactions to a given idea or event can vary tremendously, from the most withdrawn behavior to the most explosive. Jane and I saw Norma socially one evening, along with a few other students as well as some people who were not class members. Psychic matters weren’t stressed, and counterpart ideas weren’t even mentioned. That is, I made no effort to bring up the subject, nor did Norma as I waited somewhat curiously through the evening. Still, it’s worth noting that being in the presence of a relative stranger who may also be one’s counterpart does make some sort of interior difference in response or attention. I wondered about the countless times counterparts had unwittingly gathered on similar occasions, and what sort of numberless exchanges had taken place on unconscious levels between those who were psychically related in some fashion.

► UR2 Section 6: Session 732 January 22, 1975 counterparts Peter family Henry Ben
¶10

[...] They are not beautiful because they believe it is their responsibility to please your eye. [...]

¶21

[...] This does not mean that if you become consciously aware of such affiliations you must then feel it your responsibility to form a kind of culture of counterparts, or to try and affect other people’s lives by reminding them of your relationship. [...]