Books:
TSM,
SS,
NoPR,
UR1 2,
NotP,
NoME,
TMA,
DEaVF1 2,
SDPC,
WTH,
TES1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9,
TPS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7,
ECS 1 2 3 4,
✖
2 results for (book:ur2 AND session:711 AND stemmed:ourselv)
►
UR2 Section 4: Session 711 October 9, 1974
station
programs
psyche
grocer
characters
– The "Unknown" Reality: Volume Two
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Section 4: Explorations. A Study of the Psyche As It Is Related to Private Life and the Experience of the Species. Probable Realities As a Course of Personal Experience. Personal Experience As It Is Related to “Past” and “Future” Civilizations of Man
– Session 711: Tuning in to Other Realities. Earth Programming and the Inner Literature of the Mind
– Session 711 October 9, 1974 9:17 P.M. Wednesday
Perhaps it’s been remiss on our parts, but Jane and I haven’t concerned ourselves with any connections her Seth may have with ancient Seths. We don’t believe such relationships exist on any kind of personalized basis, although someday we’ll ask Seth to comment here. We think the name of Jane’s Seth came about through much more pragmatic needs. In Chapter 1 of The Seth Material, Jane quoted Seth-to-be from the 4th session for December 8, 1963, as that personality came through on the Ouija board (which we’d used to initiate these sessions): “You may call me whatever you choose. I call myself Seth. It fits the me of me….” Reincarnation had been mentioned by the 2nd session, but since the concept meant little to us we hardly considered the many names that would be involved. Once Seth gave us a name by which to call him, we simply began using it. I’m sure that at the time Jane had no conscious knowledge about Egyptian, Hebrew, or even Christian origins or uses connected with the name, Seth.
►
UR2 Appendix 18: (For Session 711)
appendix
Jung
excerpts
animus
particles
– The "Unknown" Reality: Volume Two
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Appendix 18: Seth on His Own Reality; on His Past, Present, and Future Relationship With Jane and Rob; and on the Inner Mechanisms of the Sessions
– (For Session 711)
[...]
My notes at the time show that I was also distinctly surprised by Seth’s comments on his emotional behavior at his own “level of activity,” but I soon understood my reaction as a sign that we still had things to learn about him, as well as ourselves.
[...]