Books:
TSM,
SS,
NoPR,
UR1 2,
NotP,
NoME,
TMA,
DEaVF1 2,
SDPC,
WTH,
TES1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9,
TPS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7,
ECS 1 2 3 4,
✖
3 results for (book:ur2 AND session:711 AND stemmed:answer)
►
UR2 Appendix 16: (For Session 711)
sidewalks
city
theater
traps
beloved
– The "Unknown" Reality: Volume Two
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Appendix 16: Seth on the Dream “Inner City”
– (For Session 711)
(In answer to a question from a student:) A beloved trap is one that you set for yourself. And so our city will be full of them. When you are tired of playing a Catholic priest, for example, you will fall into your own trap — in which your beliefs [as such a one] are suddenly worked out to their logical perfection, and you see what they mean.
►
UR2 Section 4: Session 711 October 9, 1974
station
programs
psyche
grocer
characters
– The "Unknown" Reality: Volume Two
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Section 4: Explorations. A Study of the Psyche As It Is Related to Private Life and the Experience of the Species. Probable Realities As a Course of Personal Experience. Personal Experience As It Is Related to “Past” and “Future” Civilizations of Man
– Session 711: Tuning in to Other Realities. Earth Programming and the Inner Literature of the Mind
– Session 711 October 9, 1974 9:17 P.M. Wednesday
[...]
That intent set up certain signals that reached into other realities or stations, and I answered.
[...]
[...]
And so in his own way Seth answered my question of a few minutes ago.
[...]
Now I present Seth in part from the ESP class session for April 17, 1973, as he answered students’ questions:
►
UR2 Appendix 18: (For Session 711)
appendix
Jung
excerpts
animus
particles
– The "Unknown" Reality: Volume Two
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Appendix 18: Seth on His Own Reality; on His Past, Present, and Future Relationship With Jane and Rob; and on the Inner Mechanisms of the Sessions
– (For Session 711)
[...]
Every bit of information helped, although often in the beginning I didn’t know enough to follow up answers with more questions.
[...]
(Then, in the 6th session Seth’s answer to my question: “Do you have a last name?” couldn’t have been more precise: “No.”
[...]
[...]
For on many occasions I will see the questions within your mind, or the minds of your witnesses, and [again in your terms] will therefore answer them ahead of time.
[...]
It was also bombarding Jane with questions for which she found no acceptable answers.
[...]
•