Books:
TSM,
SS,
NoPR,
UR1 2,
NotP,
NoME,
TMA,
DEaVF1 2,
SDPC,
WTH,
TES1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9,
TPS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7,
ECS 1 2 3 4,
✖
1 result for (book:ur1 AND session:697 AND stemmed:chosen)
▼
UR1 Section 3: Session 697 May 13, 1974
2/32 (6%)
brotherhood
idealizations
species
cells
photograph
– The "Unknown" Reality: Volume One
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Section 3: The Private Probable Man, The Private Probable Woman, The Species in Probabilities, And Blueprints for Realities
– Session 697: Idealizations, Free Will, and Human Development. How You Choose Events, Health, and Illness. Practice Element 7
– Session 697 May 13, 1974 9:18 P.M. Monday
[... 3 paragraphs ...]
The idealizations themselves are made of “conscious” stuff. These are not inert data,1 then. The nature of probabilities determines the framework in which these fulfillments can take place, and “frames” living developments. The structure of probabilities provides on the one hand a system of barriers, in which practical growth is not chosen or significant; and on the other hand it insures a safe, creative, rich environment — a reality — in which the idealization can choose from an almost infinite variety of possible actions those best suited to its own fulfillment.
[... 11 paragraphs ...]
Many of your global dilemmas seem so desperate only because in those areas you have gone as far as you can go — without going further. The problems act as stimuli in that regard. This doesn’t mean that you have to experience disasters. They are not preordained. It does mean that you have chosen certain experiences, but that these will automatically lead to further creative development if you allow them to. The idealization is one of brotherhood, in terms of your species. Biologically, in your terms, such “brotherhood” operates instinctively in the cooperation of the body’s cells, as they function together to form the private corporal structure. At your viewpoint you lose appreciation for the great individuality of each cell. You take it for granted that because the cells work so well together, they have no private uniqueness.
[... 15 paragraphs ...]
Similar sessions
►
TES5 Session 213 December 1, 1965
Ormond
test
season
envelope
postmark
– The Early Sessions: Book 5 of The Seth Material
– © 2013 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 213 December 1, 1965 9:50 PM Wednesday
►
TPS3 Deleted Session November 18, 1974
ape
instincts
identification
pygmy
grandfather
– The Personal Sessions: Book 3 of The Deleted Seth Material
– © 2016 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Deleted Session November 18, 1974 9:42 PM Monday
►
UR1 Section 3: Session 698 May 20, 1974
dream
lackadaisical
semiconstruction
world
useless
– The "Unknown" Reality: Volume One
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Section 3: The Private Probable Man, The Private Probable Woman, The Species in Probabilities, And Blueprints for Realities
– Session 698: The Dream World, Dream Artists, and the Purpose of Dreaming
– Session 698 May 20, 1974 9:28 P.M. Monday
►
TPS4 Deleted Session January 3, 1978
approval
ommm
calm
misunderstandings
berate
– The Personal Sessions: Book 4 of The Deleted Seth Material
– © 2016 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Deleted Session January 3, 1978 9:30 PM Tuesday