2 results for (book:ur1 AND session:690 AND stemmed:both)

UR1 Appendix 9: (For Session 690) Sumari sexuality song passivity female

Your ideas of sexuality follow both your religions and your sciences, then, for you have created each. But you always know what you are doing, and there are cycles in the earth, and in your being and your soul. And so you are in the process of reuniting yourself, and discovering what the word “humanity” means. You are finding out the meaning of individuality, which is a far more important word than you realize, and when you understand that meaning, then your own individuality will express itself in its natural form. Regardless of what words are put upon your experience in terms of sexual roles, you will be a full human being. When the conscious and the unconscious minds are understood, you will have no more problems with sexuality.

2. Sumari is a “family of consciousness” that Jane first contacted in ESP class for November 23, 1971. She and I are both Sumari. Jane describes the whole development in chapters 7 and 8 of Adventures. Various Sumari examples can also be found in Chapter 20 and the Appendix of her novel, Oversoul Seven. (And, I can write later, Seth expands his family-of-consciousness material considerably in Session 732, Section 6, Volume 2 of “Unknown” Reality.)

UR1 Section 2: Session 690 March 21, 1974 Christ architect species religious Jehovah

[...] Both above and below your usual conscious focus, then, time is experienced in an entirely different fashion, and is constantly manipulated,3 as physically you manipulate matter.

[...] Further developments in your concepts will lead to greater activation in portions of the brain now not nearly utilized,5 and these in turn will trigger expansions in both psychic and biological terms.

1. In the 582nd session in Chapter 20 of Seth Speaks, I quoted Seth during a 1971 ESP class: “All consciousness does, indeed, exist at once, and therefore it did not evolve in those terms … the theory of evolution is as beautiful a tale as the theory of Biblical creation … both might seem to exist within their own systems, and yet, in larger respects they cannot be realities….”