3 results for (book:ur1 AND session:690 AND stemmed:seth)
Sumari
sexuality
song
passivity
female
(In ESP class for April 16, a student asked Seth to comment on “the differences between the male and female [human beings] as we understand them.” Seth’s answer was a long one. It clearly illuminated his material in this session, as can be seen in the excerpt I’ve put together for this presentation. [This sometimes happens in class: Seth will elaborate upon book information, or discuss it from a different viewpoint; this in turn makes Jane and me want to see such material used in the book.])
(Without a break Jane went from her Seth trance into another very creative mode of consciousness. For perhaps five minutes she sang to the class in Sumari,2 the trance language she initiated a few years ago. I’ve always found the quality of her Sumari expression to be of a high order. Each song is unique and thrilling, whether it’s muted or powerful, melodic or animated; often the particular delivery is made up of a combination of such attributes, as it was this evening. Class members discussed the song briefly. Then Jane came through as Sumari once more, but this time she spoke in conversational tones.3 Immediately she was finished, Seth returned:)
All time is simultaneous (Seth told the members of class), and so you are male and female at once.
2. Sumari is a “family of consciousness” that Jane first contacted in ESP class for November 23, 1971. She and I are both Sumari. Jane describes the whole development in chapters 7 and 8 of Adventures. Various Sumari examples can also be found in Chapter 20 and the Appendix of her novel, Oversoul Seven. (And, I can write later, Seth expands his family-of-consciousness material considerably in Session 732, Section 6, Volume 2 of “Unknown” Reality.)
Christ
architect
species
religious
Jehovah
(Then we wondered whether Seth had referred to aspects of Christ’s philosophy that were truly buried — quite unknown today. Almost always I refrain from interrupting the flow of session material with questions, but now I wished I’d asked Seth about that. [...]
1. In the 582nd session in Chapter 20 of Seth Speaks, I quoted Seth during a 1971 ESP class: “All consciousness does, indeed, exist at once, and therefore it did not evolve in those terms … the theory of evolution is as beautiful a tale as the theory of Biblical creation … both might seem to exist within their own systems, and yet, in larger respects they cannot be realities….”
[...] Tonight, Jane said, she’d try letting Seth come through, although she didn’t think she was at her best. [...]
(“Good evening, Seth.”)