2 results for (book:ur1 AND session:685 AND stemmed:thought)

UR1 Appendix 4: (For Session 685) sidepools neurological bypass Saratoga linear

“Now I do recall something: I was getting a whole bunch of material and it was multidimensional. I was confused. I thought part of it went with stuff already given … but in a … probable way. I didn’t see how it could be inserted into a normal manuscript because it had this extra dimension. It was here that I got angry and woke myself up. As I opened my eyes, I realized that the material hadn’t been given yet in ‘Unknown’ Reality — though in the sleep state I was sure it had been.

“Ruburt’s difficulty, anger, and impatience last night3 resulted from initial problems of translating multidimensional experience into linear terms and thought patterns. Fresh material was being born anew in the past, and he didn’t know how to fit it into his time scheme.”

“Instead, I felt myself entering another level of consciousness. I grumbled for a minute, wondering if I wanted to go along or end it and type. Then I thought that something important might be up; and I ‘knew’ that this-whatever it was-was connected with my experiences of last night. So I went along, and wrote my second statement of the day.

“Toward the end of the material (in the second statement) I briefly thought the Seth level might be involved, but the wording didn’t come through as automatically and smoothly as it does with Seth, and I didn’t feel his … personality. The information referred to me as Ruburt, though, which automatically meant that it was from a ‘higher’ or other level than the Ruburt one. Yet I dislike the connotations called up by my use of the word ‘higher’ here.

UR1 Section 1: Session 685 February 25, 1974 Preface network selectivity desultorily ostensibly

[...] I thought Jane’s trance had been a good one, even though she’d used many pauses, but she told me that she hadn’t been at her best. [...]

(I discussed with Jane the questions I’d thought of when Seth had commented, above, on… how limiting previous concepts of psychology have been.”: As a discipline, why was psychology so narrowly developed? [...]

[...] “We hadn’t given the idea of a preface a thought. [...]