1 result for (book:ur1 AND session:681 AND stemmed:past)

UR1 Section 1: Session 681 February 11, 1974 4/78 (5%) unpredictability predictable probable atoms massive
– The "Unknown" Reality: Volume One
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Section 1: You and the “Unknown” Reality
– Session 681: How Your Probable Selves Intersect. Unpredictability as the Source of All Events
– Session 681 February 11, 1974 9:28 P.M. Monday

[... 23 paragraphs ...]

The cells are also aware of probabilities in a more familiar fashion than you are, as they manipulate the past and future history of the body. Ruburt now, again, is experiencing massiveness, as in your idea of probabilities the cellular structure feels its vast endurance. Working with events not even real to you, it produces a physical structure that maintains identity and predictability out of a vastly creative network. That network is unpredictable, yet from it Ruburt can predictably put ashes into that shell. (Jane held up her favorite ashtray, the abalone shell we’d found in Baja California in 1958, and tapped some ashes into it from her cigarette.) The predictability of that gesture rests upon the basis of an unpredictability, in which multitudinous other actions could have occurred, and in other realities do occur.

[... 44 paragraphs ...]

“Now: Often precognitive information will appear to be wrong. In some cases this is because a self has chosen a different probable event for physical materialization [than the one predicted]. I have access to the field of probabilities and you do not, egotistically…. To me, your past, present, and future merge into one.

“On the other hand, as I have told you, you change your past continually. It does not appear to change to you, for you change with it … You alter your future in the same manner. In such cases it is necessary that the correct channel of probable events be perceived — correct meaning the channel which shall be ultimately chosen [for actualization by the subject] .

“These choices, however, are based upon your changing perception of past and present. Because I have a larger scope of perception than you, I can with greater facility predict what may happen. But this is dependent upon my prediction as to which choice [of probable events] you will make, and the choice is still your own … Predictions, per se, do not contradict the theory of free will, though free will is dependent upon much more than any freedom of the ego alone. If the ego were allowed to make all the choices, with no veto power from other layers of the self, you would all be in a sad position indeed.

[... 6 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

UR1 Section 1: Session 682 February 13, 1974 units propensities unpredictability probable selection
UR1 Section 3: Session 704 June 17, 1974 oracle physician predict disease psyche
UR1 Section 3: Session 698 May 20, 1974 dream lackadaisical semiconstruction world useless
UR1 Section 1: Session 684 February 20, 1974 units fluctuates poised blink selectivity