our

1 result for (book:tps6 AND heading:"delet session june 9 1981" AND stemmed:our)

TPS6 Deleted Session June 9, 1981 4/32 (12%) Kubler Ross kr redistributions slothful
– The Personal Sessions: Book 6 of The Deleted Seth Material
– © 2017 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Deleted Session June 9, 1981 8:47 PM Tuesday

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

(The article in question is a Playboy interview with Elizabeth Kubler-Ross. Leonard Yaudes left the May, 1981 issue recently, and Jane has been reading the interview therein once I noticed it and suggested that she review it. Kubler-Ross’s hassles —at least some of them—remind us of our own. I’ll note briefly that late last year, in November-December, Jane attempted to get in touch with Kubler-Ross at the behest of a friend of KR’s who had attended Sheri Perl’s classes. Jane was to call KR at a conference in Wappinger’s Falls, NY; she tried a number of times, always to be put off by a rather unpleasant and officious woman who was always saying that KR was “in conference” and couldn’t be disturbed. Jane wouldn’t leave our private number. KR, we were told, knew that Jane would be calling—indeed, had requested that she do so. The two never did make contact, so we figured it was for the best, for whatever reasons. According to our phone bill, Jane’s last attempt at contact was on December 5, 1980. “Well,” I said, “presumably KR knew you tried to reach her, so since you never got a letter or note later, forget it. That is, if that secretary, or whatever she was, was relaying your messages....”

[... 1 paragraph ...]

(Our family of raccoons was stirring a bit in the fireplace behind my chair as I sat facing Jane on the couch. My back felt a little better, although not clear. “If it works out and you have a minute tonight, and if you’re in the mood to say something about Israel and Iraq, it would be interesting,” I told Jane. She nodded. She was very relaxed.

[... 6 paragraphs ...]

Both represent systems of belief quite different from our own material in many respects. It is important to realize that in usual terms even great visions need not agree with each other. For they are each viewing experience from a highly concentrated yet uniquely individual standpoint. They each see “reality” from a different angle, and thus create a different view.

[... 14 paragraphs ...]

The subject matter is too large to begin with this evening. Bring it to my attention by stating the question before our next session. Now I bid you a fine and hearty good evening.

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TPS3 Deleted Session January 10, 1977 conventionalized goals classifications proposals Caesar
TES8 Session 400 March 20, 1968 vision technical technique realism medium
UR2 Appendix 22: (For Session 724) Roman soldier tower Jerusalem Peter
TES1 Session 24 February 10, 1964 clock duration psychological invention inner