1 result for (book:tps6 AND heading:"copi of inspir type materi receiv saturday februari 6" AND stemmed:seth)

TPS6 Copy of inspirational type material received Saturday, February 6 6/13 (46%) Mona Lisa canvas solving problems
– The Personal Sessions: Book 6 of The Deleted Seth Material
– © 2017 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Copy of inspirational type material received Saturday, February 6 after reading portions of my 1973 notebook

[... 1 paragraph ...]

Seth as a “master event.” As the Mona Lisa is “more real” than, say, a normal object or the canvas that composes it, so is all good or great art more than its own physical manifestation. Consider art as a natural phenomena constructed by the psyche, a trans-species of perception and consciousness that changes, enlarges and expands life’s experiences and casts them in a different light, offering new opportunities for creating action and new solutions to problems by inserting new, original data.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

I’ve rejected all that kind of hash projected onto Seth’s books by others or myself—the assumptions that Seth must prove himself as a problem solver— or the importance of functionalism over art.

The larger view is that art by being itself, is bigger than life, while springing from it; that Seth and my books go beyond that simply by being themselves. They automatically put people in a different vaster psychological space, another frame of reference, in which a good number of problems vanish or simply do not apply....

To do that, I have to drop those old feelings of responsibility as a primary focus (to get the ideas out quickly so they can help people, etc.) because those feelings strain the Seth-book framework particularly when I demand that in each book Seth answers all questions and so forth.

Again as with master events, we’re dealing with a different framework of action entirely, where the Mona Lisa is “more real” than the physical properties that compose it, which is not to deny the validity of the canvas, say. But to discuss Seth or Seth’s ideas primarily from the true-or-false framework is the same thing as considering the Mona Lisa only from the validity of the physical properties of paint and canvas; very, very limiting. To “just” say that Seth’s ideas are true is to limit him and us....

For Seth to comment on our world is okay, but for me to somehow insist that his material offer solutions to all of men’s problems is not— instead it limits the sessions creative thrust. The Seth material is supposed to put us in a different psychic position where the problems are solved automatically or are at least diminished or do not apply.... Only not concentrating on the problems brings in the needed extra material to solve them.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TES9 Session 465 February 17, 1969 prophet background painting lips figure
DEaVF2 Chapter 9: Session 931, July 15, 1981 sinful overlays journal church bonding
TES7 Supplement to Envelope Data for Session 283 69th Experiment September 5, 1966 Barbara Ali Baba Vases Belvoir
TES7 Peggy Gallagher’s Notes Regarding Friday, September 23, 1966 Barb Greenwich Connecticut pine grip