1 result for (book:tps5 AND session:898 AND stemmed:would)

TPS5 Session 898 (Deleted Portion) January 30, 1980 4/22 (18%) sons daughters embody bare father
– The Personal Sessions: Book 5 of The Deleted Seth Material
– © 2016 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 898 (Deleted Portion) January 30, 1980 9:28 PM Wednesday

[... 7 paragraphs ...]

A daughter, however, would have given him a beneficial relationship, someone with whom he could discuss such feelings, as he did with you in the dream. With sons, he felt that he should not show emotions of defeat, and he felt that communication itself had the feminine overtones of an unfortunate nature.

The dream was simply a small scenario. (Long pause.) Such probable currents ride beneath all relationships. If your father did have daughters, rather than sons in the life that you know, he actually would have fared better in the physical world, because he would have felt it his duty to protect them financially: he would have considered them fairly helpless, and in need of his abilities. As his sons grew out of boyhood he felt that they dwarfed him. He was in a fashion frightened of the ideas of masculinity he grew up with—ideas he felt he did not embody, and he projected those upon his sons so that in a fashion they overawed him, or put him to shame.

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

I referred to that, I thought, in my preliminary statement about time references—that you recognize yourself in a dream even if the other references do not agree with known reality. There is no contradiction in a dream if you and your father are approximately the same age, for example. From my understanding of it, there was no other significance to the age orientation, except that the two of you were adults, and thus would have had a long shared background behind you.

[... 5 paragraphs ...]

(10:30 PM. Jane didn’t remember the dream material. I thought it excellent, I told her. I was pleased to have tuned in to a probable reality, even if so briefly. More and more I appreciate the fantastic reality of dreams—the tremendous knowledge and variety, literally unending, that’s embodied within them. “Just think of the number of people who have dreams like that,” I said, “but who either don’t remember them, or pay any attention to them if they do. Look what they’re missing....” Later I thought that I should have asked Seth what kind of interpretation of the dream a conventional psychologist would have given.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

Similar sessions

ECS4 ESP Class Session, June 29, 1971 Joel beyond flesh kinda sand
TPS1 Session 372 (Deleted) October 16, 1967 rage father mother shell catharsis
TPS1 Session 375 (Deleted) October 26, 1967 fragment twins sons father mother
NoME Part One: Chapter 2: Session 806, July 30, 1977 memory events past floating future