“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] That is, I said, “I could ask 5,000 questions, but I haven’t planned any for tonight.” [...] “But the publisher would want it organized according to subject matter, or presented in some orderly way,” I replied, whereupon she wrinkled her face at the work this might involve: “But you could do all that after we got the material....”

[...] It wants to ignore the creative aspects of the universe, however, which are everywhere apparent, and it first of all believes that it must divorce itself from any evidence of feeling. [...] The male god is a god of power. He is not a god of creativity.

[...] Through creativity the species senses All That Is. [...] It is a source of revelation and inspiration—but revelation and inspiration do not initially deal with power, but with knowing. [...]

He was creative, and is. Yet he felt that women were inferior, and that his very abilities made him vulnerable, that he would be ridiculed by others, that women were not taken seriously as profound thinkers, or innovators in philosophical matters.

[...] God is supposed to be male. The soul is sometimes considered female. [...] The story says that Eve tempted the male, having him eat of the tree of good and evil, or the tree of knowledge. [...]

[...] “Here you won’t go to the marketplace, but you think of saving all of these private sessions for posterity, to give them to the world. You’re very close-mouthed: you don’t blab our personal business, as you put it, but you’d do that.... Instead, I see us when I’m 80 and you’re 90, out in the backyard, burning it all.” [...]

(A copy of this session is also being placed in the deleted notebook, since I’d like it to be placed under both categories.) I think it contains some excellent general material that, I told Jane, I was afreaid wouldn’t be seen by anyone if it were filed exclusively under private material.

(Actually, this evening’s session grew out of several insights Jane had given voice to in recent days, and osme relaxation effects that had followed several of those. [...] Here I was all set to go earlier.” [...]

(10:03.) The Catholic Church taught that revelation was dangerous. [...] Women were inferiors, and in matters of religion and philosophy most of all, for there their creativity could be most disruptive. [...]

[...] That work, providing the artist’s preparation, now belongs to the male-world manufacturer, you see, so the artist as a male in your society is often left with what he thinks of as art’s feminine basis, where it must be confronted, of course.