1 result for (book:tps5 AND heading:"delet session septemb 13 1979" AND stemmed:session)
8/30 (27%)
poet
tradition
creativity
specific
conflict
DELETED SESSION
[... 1 paragraph ...]
(Jane was so relaxed yesterday and last night—as she has been often lately—that we held no session. At the same time she’s been extremely creative, working on her God of Jane, and the introduction to Mass Events—producing many pages of excellent material for those works. She’s been quite inspired. Even though she was again very relaxed today, she was also active writing. In fact, after supper tonight she produced two more pages of notes that she’d picked up from Seth on his new book: Dreams, “Evolution,” and Value Fulfillment. She laughed. “I keep trying to change that title, though.” She’d picked up the title as long ago as July 30, 1979—see the 869th session note. A copy is attached of her notes having to do with the new book. I’ve been expecting Seth to begin it at any time.
(Jane suggested having an earlier session, although I hadn’t really expected her to have one at all. My only recent concern has been that she not let the sessions go on a regular basis just because I’m working on the notes for Mass Events.
[... 3 paragraphs ...]
(Pause.) The two of you thought of yourselves specifically as a writer—or rather a poet—and an artist before our sessions began. I would like to clear up some important issues.
[... 1 paragraph ...]
To some extent you had your own niches, recognizable by society even if they were relatively (underlined) unusual. You did not know that there was a deeper, older, or richer tradition—a more ancient heritage, to which you belonged, because you found no hint of it in your society. It seemed at different times since our sessions began that there were disruptive conflicts, for example: was Ruburt a writer or was he a psychic? Were you an artist, or weren’t you? What about the writing you did—both for our books, and the writing that you sometimes plan to do on your own?
[... 5 paragraphs ...]
The sessions I give you, in usual (underlined) terms, are a new extension of that creativity—but again, that extension has an ancient heritage. (To me again:) Your own writing, of course, is art. It is also a method of understanding and perceiving creativity. It is a method of learning that redoubles upon itself, and you are uniquely equipped (pause) to discover comprehensions from a standpoint that is most unusual, unique.
[... 9 paragraphs ...]
He should—meaning predictive, he will. End of session.
[... 3 paragraphs ...]
(9:16 PM. And right at the end of the session, Jane’s head flopped down loosely, as she quickly returned to the very relaxed state she’d known before, while speaking for Seth.)
