his

1 result for (book:tps5 AND heading:"delet session novemb 26 1979" AND stemmed:his)

TPS5 Deleted Session November 26, 1979 6/47 (13%) static Framework tract urinary communication
– The Personal Sessions: Book 5 of The Deleted Seth Material
– © 2016 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Deleted Session November 26, 1979 8:55 PM Monday

[... 10 paragraphs ...]

Without consciously knowing how his body performs such manipulations, he trusts it—the hands to hold the brush, the fingers to type or whatever, and the idea becomes reality. The idea comes from Framework 2, and Framework 2’s activity fuels the body’s actions.

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

(Pause.) This is still very difficult to verbalize. (Pause.) The main, driving, clear, emotional intent in such a project is the author’s. The book is his baby. Remember, we are dealing with emotional intensities—and it is because of emotional intensities that our books are in so many homes. That intensity has its own force and vitality.

(A note: I think Seth inserted his remark about the books being in so many homes because our mail has rather strikingly reminded us lately of that fact; we’ve been talking about it.)

[... 8 paragraphs ...]

Mankind’s most majestic experiences, and his most unfortunate, still come from that same great creative force. I have been very careful in my use of the word love, because it is so bandied about and distorted—but all creativity, and any work of art, and any life, springs from love—a love that automatically brings all things into their own kinds of order. The artist paints because he loves to. His brain and fingers are able to produce a painting because they are themselves formed of love.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

I have one other point to mention, apropos: our session regarding the two men (see the deleted session, for me, of April 18, 1979). You get in trouble only when you identify too strongly with the socially inoculated man, so that you can say “With my beliefs, I do not think I can learn to put Prentice in Framework 2.” (See my closing notes for the last deleted session.) The “my” there, in that sentence, refers to the socially inoculated man. The other man has no difficulties at all in that regard, and that man is you, too. You could at least ask his opinion.

[... 16 paragraphs ...]

(10:10. “I had a funny feeling before the session,” Jane said. “That it was one of those times when he had to dribble the material down to me word by word. It made me feel real impatient—not on his part but my own. I also had the feeling that there are about five frameworks out there, but that everything has to come down to us through Framework 1 before we can understand it.”

[... 1 paragraph ...]

Similar sessions

NoME Part One: Chapter 1: Session 801, April 18, 1977 epidemics inoculation Mass Volume finished
NoME Part One: Chapter 2: Session 814, October 8, 1977 flu inoculations season disease shots
NoME Part Three: Chapter 6: Session 841, March 14, 1979 viruses immunity thoughts Jonestown autopsies
TPS4 Deleted Session July 12, 1978 Emir Eleanor conservative weight truth