two

1 result for (book:tps5 AND heading:"delet session novemb 26 1979" AND stemmed:two)

TPS5 Deleted Session November 26, 1979 4/47 (9%) static Framework tract urinary communication
– The Personal Sessions: Book 5 of The Deleted Seth Material
– © 2016 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Deleted Session November 26, 1979 8:55 PM Monday

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

(I was feeling somewhat better, but wasn’t clear as I wanted to be yet. I had a few questions I wanted to ask Seth if I got the chance, but hadn’t talked them over with Jane before the session. We’d celebrated Thanksgiving last Thursday with our first turkey in two years.

[... 20 paragraphs ...]

You set a far more favorable group of probabilities into motion, a group that aids you and them as well, for they are also seeking creativity from their separate viewpoints. They are also fighting their own static. You do not have to contact them one by one in Framework 2. The book itself is like a magnet—any book. The same kinds of reactions, however, are involved in all activities, and it is sometimes frustrating for me that you cannot perceive the fascinating facets of any event. All group interactions of course are involved here. (Pause.) You still —and I do not simply mean you two alone—do not feel the unsurpassable force that thoughts have. You do not understand that they do form events, that to change events you must first change thoughts. You get what you concentrate upon. To brood or worry, or become resentful, is as regrettable as it would be if you, say, painted a big X over one of your paintings because you were dissatisfied with a detail or two. Over a period of time, resentments X out large areas of otherwise productive experience.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

I have one other point to mention, apropos: our session regarding the two men (see the deleted session, for me, of April 18, 1979). You get in trouble only when you identify too strongly with the socially inoculated man, so that you can say “With my beliefs, I do not think I can learn to put Prentice in Framework 2.” (See my closing notes for the last deleted session.) The “my” there, in that sentence, refers to the socially inoculated man. The other man has no difficulties at all in that regard, and that man is you, too. You could at least ask his opinion.

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

(Earlier in the month I’d grown so disgusted with the whole business that I’d resolved not to bother asking Seth for help—then before tonight’s session I’d spontaneously had the idea that I would ask if I got the chance. I reread daily many of the private sessions he’s given for us in the last year or two—especially those in Book 20. A number of those deal with my challenges involving the side, groin, taxes, and so forth. I seem to be a slow learner; either that or my accumulated resentments seem to be so deeply ingrained that I should work much harder at eradicating old beliefs.)

[... 13 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

NoME Part One: Chapter 1: Session 801, April 18, 1977 epidemics inoculation Mass Volume finished
NoME Part One: Chapter 2: Session 814, October 8, 1977 flu inoculations season disease shots
NoME Part Three: Chapter 6: Session 841, March 14, 1979 viruses immunity thoughts Jonestown autopsies
TPS4 Deleted Session July 12, 1978 Emir Eleanor conservative weight truth