1 result for (book:tps5 AND heading:"delet session novemb 21 1979" AND stemmed:session)
DELETED SESSION
[... 1 paragraph ...]
(This is the first session held since the deleted one for November 12. I am feeling quite a bit better; I’ve been painting in the mornings and working in the yard afternoons, doing errands, etc. The only thing that’s suffered has been work on Mass Events, but now I’m gradually moving back into that endeavor also.
(Last Monday evening Jane had been so relaxed that she’d passed up the session. I thought she’d felt somewhat the same way today, and was rather surprised when she told me at 8:30 PM that she’d have the session....
[... 23 paragraphs ...]
Ruburt is doing well. The book of love poetry is an excellent idea. You should still help him to trust relaxation, but I want both of you to take this session to heart, so that it can help you accelerate your growing understanding, and bring you more beneficial practical results.
[... 3 paragraphs ...]
Trust your impulses, and underscore that line three times, for again they represent your close connection to Framework 2’s activity. End of session.
[... 2 paragraphs ...]
(9:42 PM. At first thought I didn’t know what to make of the session, which I suppose merely reflects my own indecisive state of mind about the hassle with foreign publishers, Prentice-Hall, money, art, writing, and so forth. All the details about the foreign rights fiasco are on file, so there’s no need to recount them here, except to say that Tam, serving as liaison for us with Ariston and Ankh-Hermes, has failed, as far as we know at this writing, to elicit any response from anyone at either place. Just what I expected, I told Jane, and added that it looked like we would end up stuck with mangled work distributed in Europe.
[... 1 paragraph ...]
(I haven’t had a chance to talk it over with Jane yet—not until I get this session typed—but I’d like Seth to talk about the part others play when we, for example, do change over our accounts. That is, I need information on how our changeovers will affect others, perhaps leading them to alter habitual patterns of thought and operation so that we get what we want. But what about what they want or are used to? I want to know about resistances that may operate, and refusals to cooperate, even on subconscious levels. I don’t see simply Jane’s and my wishes having the power to change the behavior of other groups of people to that degree, I guess—unless our change of thought shifts all else into another probability.)