1 result for (book:tps5 AND heading:"delet session may 28 1979" AND stemmed:jane)

TPS5 Deleted Session May 28, 1979 4/33 (12%) faster Scout permission consoled ground
– The Personal Sessions: Book 5 of The Deleted Seth Material
– © 2016 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Deleted Session May 28, 1979 10:15 PM Monday

[... 1 paragraph ...]

(The session started late because Jane became so involved in a painting after supper. It was one in which she was attempting to follow in a still-life some of the techniques I’d showed her a few days ago, when I repainted another still-life composition she’d started, and showed her how to get more opaque effects for variety; a demonstration, then, for she’d asked for “a lesson.” Since then there have been some rather humorous episodes—I mean it kindly—as Jane tries to use those methods, with very mixed results. But interestingly, she ran into conflicts between her old method, in which she used mostly transparent color, and the new one, which, she complained in her frustration, was “muddy, and lacking vitality. And without the vitality, what good is it?”

[... 1 paragraph ...]

(Our dream discussion before the session led me to voice a question about dreams that I don’t think Seth has covered in just that way. Sue Watkins visited us last night, and related several recent dreams in which she saw Jane functioning normally physically. [I’ve also had others in which Jane was okay physically – walking well, and so forth.] “But what happens,” I asked, as we waited for the session to begin, “after I have the dream about you, for example? Do you receive it? Do you accept it or reject it, or does it do you good on certain levels? How come, with all of these positive dreams, you aren’t improving physically to any observable degree? If you get the messages we sent you, do they do any good at all?” The questions would apply in any dream exchange among people, of course.

(Jane was “just mad,” though, as we waited for the session to start at 10:10. Mad about it all, she said. “What good does it do for Seth to go into me? None that I can tell....” She’d been upset about her painting too, of course. She’s been trying to follow her impulses more spontaneously recently, in light of the recent session material, and I think has shown good improvement there. But she was blue earlier today, when various portions of her anatomy bothered her. Her legs have bothered a lot lately, and she’s felt down at times.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

(Jane’s delivery was good, interspersed with many pauses. and often fast and emphatic.

[... 24 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

DEaVF1 Chapter 3: Session 889, December 17, 1979 units waves cu particles operate
TPS3 Session 762 (Deleted Portion) December 15, 1975 bathroom walk respond driveway faster
TES1 Session 33 March 9, 1964 limb confidence wind Kennedy permission
SS Part One: Chapter 1: Session 513, February 5, 1970 warp linear infrequently blotted grammatically