1 result for (book:tps5 AND heading:"delet session januari 10 1979" AND stemmed:impuls)

TPS5 Deleted Session January 10, 1979 5/47 (11%) shovel sports driveway plowed sexual
– The Personal Sessions: Book 5 of The Deleted Seth Material
– © 2016 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Deleted Session January 10, 1979 9:27 PM Wednesday

[... 1 paragraph ...]

(“Home, sex, power, you and the driveway, hay fever, the impulsive selves that we were talking about earlier tonight”—these are all words dictated to me by Jane abruptly as we sat waiting for the session to begin.

[... 6 paragraphs ...]

Now: I have given some—not all—of this material before, but now you can put the understanding to better advantage. Ruburt’s “overly conscientious self” was indeed built up in response to his belief that he was, to begin with, overly enthusiastic, overly impulsive, overly spontaneous. He was naturally expressive and open with people. He was creatively gifted—but an overly impulsive child does not care for an invalid mother, conscientiously, for 21 years.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

He thought of himself as overly impulsive. Very seldom did he yell back at his mother. An impulsive child might have done far more. He refrained from heavy sexual encounters—certainly not the behavior of a sexually impulsive person. He knew he didn’t want a family.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

You considered yourself not impulsive, yet it is you who wrote “Make me a galaxy, Jane,” took up with Ruburt after a very brief acquaintanceship, and brought him home to your startled family.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

There are bodies, in those terms, who do not want to have physical offspring. They are not faulty. They fit in with nature’s plans, and with the psychological plans of the personalities involved. You were rather repressed at that period, frightened about your own work, and sometimes you would ignore Ruburt’s occasional sexual advances when you happened to be in your studio. He felt he was too spontaneous, again, too impulsive—but then in that belief system he worried if his sexual needs could not be properly squashed, supposing someone else aroused them, and he “fell in love” with someone else as quickly as he had fallen in love with you. Or worse—supposing your repressed sexuality was repressed because of your joint work, and supposing you fell in love with someone else, and became sexually aroused for another?

[... 29 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

WTH Part Two: Chapter 10: June 4, 1984 spontaneous compulsive impulses maple processes
TPS5 Session 835 (Deleted Portion) February 7, 1979 conk movements shovel deleted especially
WTH Part One: Chapter 1: January 18, 1984 Shawn mood quicken Peggy Peterson
WTH Part One: Chapter 2: January 30, 1984 maintenance waft passionately exemption tasty