1 result for (book:tps4 AND heading:"delet session june 5 1978" AND stemmed:specif)
[... 4 paragraphs ...]
I want briefly to explain a few more reasons why I suggested a change of program. There is nothing wrong with asking “Are you afraid of thus and so?” of the pendulum, for example—particularly when specific events are involved, and where action is possible. For example “Am I afraid of the implications in this letter?” and then, according to the reply and circumstances, Ruburt answers the correspondent in a particular fashion, states his feelings, or does not answer at all.
[... 1 paragraph ...]
In any case feelings are thusly encountered, understood, and acted upon. Practically, you can only react to the world as you encounter it through specific experiences, and you cannot escape it, for it will come to your door. The earlier questions about fear of the world, for example, reinforced to some extent, now, generalized fears, without for example specific incidents connected to them.
[... 13 paragraphs ...]
When you do the morning suggestions then, keep Framework 2 in mind, for you are placing your intents there. The writing-down of feelings and any subsequent pendulum follow-through on specific feelings or events allows you to deal with necessary Framework 1 activity.
[... 7 paragraphs ...]
(10:29 PM. There are several excellent points in the session that we can integrate with the previous one – especially those about using the pendulum to check out specific fears, etc. In larger terms, Seth’s admonition to “let go the effort” is very important.
[... 2 paragraphs ...]