1 result for (book:tps4 AND heading:"delet session juli 3 1978" AND stemmed:ruburt)
[... 13 paragraphs ...]
The counterpart idea is merely a small attempt to hint at that interrelationship—an interrelationship of course that includes all species and forms of life. Ruburt’s idea of the four-fronted self is also an attempt to hint at that complexity in human terms.
[... 5 paragraphs ...]
You should understand that we have been talking about Framework 1 and Framework 2. Ruburt felt, and so did you to some extent, that it was easier to experience Framework 2’s spontaneity in the mental realm of imagination—but you each felt that the physical body was tied somewhat more rigidly to the dictums of Framework 1, to cause and effect. In that area Ruburt found it difficult to free himself.
A thought, in those terms now, is as physical as a foot—and a foot is as mystical as a thought. The physical body must be born and die. Within that experience, however, there is full freedom, and regardless of any ideas Ruburt might have had, the body can right itself in a moment—regardless of how long, in your terms, it has been in difficulty. That is why I have stressed the importance of impulse, and Framework 2’s activity, for there you are not confined to cause and effect.
Ruburt is progressing well with his psychological experience, and that is allowing the body’s continued release.
[... 8 paragraphs ...]