“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(We wanted a session tonight on Jane’s problem, although we’d settle for something from Seth each time, along with his other book dictation, or whatever. As a result of our work with the pendulum this morning, Jane was so relaxed by session time that she didn’t know whether she could manage a session. I suggested she try, so that her mind would be at ease. Tonight’s session was excellent, and should of course be studied in connection with the material we’ve already accumulated through pendulum work.)

(“Good evening, Seth.”)

(A note: We should ask Seth what sort of countering experience he has in mind.)

(“It will. Thank you. Good night,” I said. I knew, of course, that the session had many good things in it. Less than half a minute passed, as Jane and I talked, when Seth returned at 10:35.)

(“Thank you very much, Seth.”

(10:45 PM. Seth’s remark about the Rockefellers came about evidently because I’d read an article recently claiming that the Rockefellers were making loads of money out of the country’s inflation troubles, re the Arab oil crisis, etc. I’d forgotten it. At this time, however, I’d have trouble believing the Rockefellers weren’t making out like bandits.

(I mentioned to Jane a question I’d thought of during the session but hadn’t interrupted to ask: If the subconscious can reason, as Seth tells us, why doesn’t it understand that at times it can go too far sometimes?—that obviously the idea of selfprotection can be very damaging if carried to extremes. Why wouldn’t it back off somewhat in such a case? Its own domain could literally be threatened or obliterated if it didn’t act within bounds. Jane listened, but didn’t get anything from Seth in answer, so it’s for next time. She did say that Seth indicated that class helped her to some degree, in that she got approval from it, as in a family situation.)