1 result for (book:tps3 AND session:765 AND stemmed:would)

TPS3 Session 765 (Deleted Portion) February 2, 1976 5/19 (26%) disclosure photographs stomach album perfection
– The Personal Sessions: Book 3 of The Deleted Seth Material
– © 2016 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 765 (Deleted Portion) February 2, 1976 9:23 PM Monday

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

Your private nature makes you wonder if that involves too much disclosure, particularly where family members are concerned. The connection with paintings brings about your desire that the photographs be “as perfect as possible.” You do not want anyone else to have a hand in your own work—that is in your paintings. To reproduce paintings, or in this case photographs, seems to be tampering with them in that regard. That is, if an editor changed your copy you would be annoyed, but reproduction, you fear, can change the copy of a photograph or a painting if it is not done properly. You consider photographs originals in that regard.

The idea of disclosure however is more important, for you remember that your mother did not like to have her photograph taken. If you included any pictures of her, would she be annoyed? She did not like to have her picture taken on the one hand because she feared disclosure, and on the other hand, because her sense of perfection was affected—particularly in later years by an imperfect image.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

The wonder about your mother’s reaction however is important here. You feel she would want the family described in its best light. Your stomach became uncomfortable as those feelings tried to make themselves known.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

There is also a connection with your family’s photograph albums in general, and I have a suggestion to clearly give your father credit as photographer. Otherwise, regardless of what you say you thought, your mother would take my explanation as given.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

(There was a short exchange between Seth and me, which I didn’t note down verbatim. He repeated that my mother would be against using photographs of her—something I’d never arrived at with the pendulum. When Seth asked if I had more questions, finally, I said no, that I’d have to think it over, and that perhaps we’d decide not to use photographs after all in “Unknown” Reality.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TPS3 Deleted Session February 9, 1976 ideal taxes expression mutilate envision
TPS6 Jane’s Notes February 17, 1981 auctions messages public volatile responsible
TPS4 Deleted Session April 5, 1978 public fears art threat livelihood
TES5 Session 210 November 22, 1965 Helen test envelope husband primary