1 result for (book:tps3 AND heading:"delet session septemb 29 1975" AND stemmed:past)
[... 28 paragraphs ...]
You seem to have quite decent elements in the past to point to. Of course you do. The reasons should be clear. When Ruburt wants flexibility you see that it is “dumbness” for him to concentrate upon his lack of motion. In the same way, if you want excellent art reproductions in a book, it is dumbness to concentrate upon the inaccuracies and errors that might happen instead.
[... 17 paragraphs ...]
You (me) even arranged it so that the kind of art you wanted to do could not be done in the accepted framework of artistic reference, but would necessitate such a growth of consciousness. You chose problems, each of you, challenges, that would lead to such a development. I will tell you now that that leap is assured—for had it not been assured in what seems to be your future, I would not have emerged in your past (whispering.
(One-minute pause at 11:15.) Again, this is difficult to explain.... (One-minute pause, eyes closed.) Because you did succeed, our relationship was inserted into the past. Time constantly expands in all directions and along every conceivable point. Nothing vanishes. (Long pause.) The idea of counterparts was meant to lead you beyond time-oriented reincarnational ideas.
[... 4 paragraphs ...]