1 result for (book:tps3 AND heading:"delet session novemb 26 1975" AND stemmed:would)
[... 3 paragraphs ...]
(She wrote down the “Latin” book title as best she could: Enada Inaventum [Deus ?].The E could possibly be either an I or an A. Then at 10:10 she told me the translation of the title would be Spiritual Adventures. At 10:15 she elaborated; the title would be The Spiritual Adventures of a Monk at Large.
(“That would be the way we’d interpret it,” she said. “And whoever came back with me from my projection is standing over there—” and she pointed to our front door. “I’m not sure, but maybe the Spiritual Adventures thing is connected with you when you were doing those manuscripts; maybe you wrote it....”
[... 8 paragraphs ...]
Their time scheme is far vaster than the one you recognize. The kind of reality that you understand forms the least active portion of their actuality, and would represent, for example only, a relatively defective or “inferior” state of consciousness and comprehension, a state like (underlined), perhaps, senility. In the time in which we are speaking, the duration of those lives straddles your centuries. The individuals concerned, by their standards, are not unusually long-lived, however. They would feel no older after 5,600 years than one of you at 80. In ways almost impossible to describe, your realities mix and merge at certain points.
[... 11 paragraphs ...]
(11:15.) In your reality it seems only practical and sane to accept the evidence of your senses. In many instances, however, the two of you have defied such limitations, or these sessions would not happen, and you would have embarked upon no such exploration.
When Ruburt took your second apartment, he did so taking it on faith and against all physical evidence to the contrary that he would have the money to afford it, and the money came. Yet whenever you begin a new situation of physical improvements with Ruburt, after the first enthusiasm the both of you instantly revert to the old “test-it-out-at-once, check-the-physical-evidence” kind of thinking. This immediately removes the necessary conditions for improvement. These are laws. When you start checking in that manner, it is because you doubt the results. When you feel that way then it seems sheer Pollyanna to believe in improvement, for you are again faced with the evidence upon which you focus your attention.
[... 7 paragraphs ...]