1 result for (book:tps3 AND heading:"delet session march 2 1976" AND stemmed:visitor)
[... 41 paragraphs ...]
Now: your visitor (Andrija Puharich) is a good man—a scientist and a child; an actor of a sort, searching for wonders. The consciousness of the world is changing. Various people know it and participate in different ways. (Uri) Geller is important, because your civilization believes so in the integrity of physical matter. It confounds and outrages the conventional to see objects behave in a way they have been taught to believe is impossible.
[... 1 paragraph ...]
Your visitor believes that these children who can also move objects (and who work with AP) are unique, and a new breed—but any children of past generations who realized that such feats were possible, and desirable, could do the same thing. Your point about the footraces is well taken in that context—the mile run. (I’d explained to Jane the psychological barrier that had existed for so many years about the impossibility of a human running the mile in four minutes. But once one man had done it, many, many others have in recent years.)
[... 2 paragraphs ...]
In the past you would have been ashamed, jointly, to meet this visitor. Ruburt’s satisfaction with his book, and your reinforcement of its value, put the symptoms in the background.
[... 3 paragraphs ...]
Your visitor will help spread the word, so to speak, but the books will make their own way irregardless. The interview was important because it dispelled some of your visitor’s erroneous beliefs about “mediums,” and the utilization of energy.
[... 6 paragraphs ...]